• JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s got absolutely no reason to plead guilty. He’s not going to get a lighter sentence so he might as well cost them as much as possible by forcing a trial, and extending the news coverage of this embarrassing story.

    Not a fan of the guy or his ideology but, from his perspective, this makes perfect sense.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like obviously guilty people appealing their sentence: they have a right to do so and as such their solicitor will recommend that they do it. There’s almost no chance of them getting their sentence overturned or reduced, but you don’t ask, you don’t get.

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because they’re going to throw the book at him regardless now.

        He may also disagree with the “lawfully detained” bit of the charge, given that he has pleaded not guilty to the original charges he was due to stand trial for. But he doesn’t really have anything to lose either way. There are screaming tabloids on the case now, he might as well spin it out.

        • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d have thought they’d want less fuss, so would offer him a deal…but you’re right, I don’t think he’d accept anyway. The media circus is all he’s got.

          • JoBo@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is the UK. We don’t do plea bargains. There are sentencing guidelines which include giving credit for an early guilty plea but, in this case, I doubt it will make much difference to whatever sentence he eventually gets.