California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Touchy issue.

    I come from a country with no gun rights, at least not for civilians.

    A spare magazine is not a restricted article. Anyone can buy or make. If the matter is 10 rounds, well, you can have as many mags as you want.

    Or, have a big mag with fillers in it for inspection. When you step outside the police or whatever office, you just take those fillers out.

    • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wouldn’t the fillers be obvious just by looking at it? It’s not like magazines are bigger than they need to be.