California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • ScornForSega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s an interesting assertion - especially given the lack of actual criticism of his ruling and its arguments.

    Really. He decides to reclassify a accessories as arms, and that’s not a valid criticism. He’s legislating from the bench.

    You might want to revisit his provided statement on the matter - it wasn’t very ambiguous.

    And you might want to link it. I just guessed.

    • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He decides to reclassify a accessories as arms, and that’s not a valid criticism.

      Is that what he did? Reclassify?

      I’m increasingly confident you haven’t actually read any of it and are just talking out of your ass.

      He decides to reclassify a accessories as arms, and that’s not a valid criticism.

      Ah, so you are just straight-up full of shit. Fair enough. Way to own it. You don’t see that often.

      I was pretty sure I’d referenced the ruling in this comment chain, but on the off chance I haven’t, here’s the relevant part. Also, here’s where it was already provided.