trk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoIt's always a dissappointment, but you do it anywaylemmy.worldvideomessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down15
arrow-up1150arrow-down1videoIt's always a dissappointment, but you do it anywaylemmy.worldtrk111@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareNapain@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up36·1 year agoclicking . and , lets you go frame by frame
minus-squaretoynbee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWhile this is true, I have yet to find a way to do this on any non PC interface. :(
minus-squareOrangeXarot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI use newpipe on my phone to watch youtube content, and it has a minimum of 0.1x velocity
minus-squareBrickhead92@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoYes, but one second is a long time to press a button, especially when you’re expecting it and have your finger hovering over said button.
minus-squarePlayer2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIn many cases I have seen, the text is only up for a frame or two, not a whole second. (despite what the original picture says)
clicking . and , lets you go frame by frame
While this is true, I have yet to find a way to do this on any non PC interface. :(
deleted by creator
I use newpipe on my phone to watch youtube content, and it has a minimum of 0.1x velocity
Yes, but one second is a long time to press a button, especially when you’re expecting it and have your finger hovering over said button.
In many cases I have seen, the text is only up for a frame or two, not a whole second. (despite what the original picture says)