• A_A@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    10 months ago

    Paywalled.
    What is this about anyway ?

    Edit : Wow ! Great answers and nice project. Always good to see competition against Nvidia.

    • fatboy93@lemm.eeEnglish
      5·
      10 months ago

      Unable to read the paywalled article, but ROCm is like Nvidia’s CUDA for their GOUs. These used to be supported on and off for consumer GPUs, but get aupported mostly only for datacenter ones. Linux used to be supported, but they are bringing ROCm to windows as well.

      Probably AMD is planning to improve support for consumer GPUs, since their GPUs are competitive to Nvidia’s at a lower price point, given that local LLMs, Image generation and other AIs are in a kind of a booming trend.

      Currently, Nvidia has CUDA which is more or less the industry standard, so AMD with their ROCm and Intel with their OpenVino etc are trying to chip away at the monopoly.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nlEnglish
    6·
    10 months ago

    Good. For my last GPU is was forced to go with Nvidia since I needed CUDA. ROCm was useless for consumer GPU’s back then. Support has gotten better since from what I’ve seen, so hopefully they continue and my next GPU will be team red again.

    • Chobbes@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      Right! My thought was “fucking better be!” AMD lagging behind on general purpose compute is super disappointing.

  • MycoPete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    5·
    10 months ago

    It’s only a matter of time. Just like physx and any other Nvidia gimmick, AMD will catch up and offer it for a fraction of the price.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netEnglish
    34·
    10 months ago

    They should just let this mess quietly die and join Intel with their attempt at a cross-vendor standard.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldEnglish
      73·
      10 months ago

      AMD has the best valued CPUs on the market for consumer and DC for at least the next few years, years ahead on APUs (Phoenix runs native GPU speeds on die), and just jumped Nvidia to datacenter market with NPUs on their server class chips, making that an INSANELY great value. Also forgot AMD is in all the major game consoles out in the world aside from Switch, so they have that base as well. They’re in the best possible position for years to come versus Intel or NVidia.

      Now what are you going on about?

      • giacomo@lemm.eeEnglish
        74·
        10 months ago

        He was on about ROCm, not amd performance or market share. But thanks for the fanboy post.

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    36·
    10 months ago

    I had to abandon a project recently because AMDs shitty software would refuse to install opencl for one of their integrated graphics chips.

    Every time I’ve tried to use their subpar hardware it’s been met by exponentially more shitty subpar software. If I were in any business making decisions with real money I’d avoid AMD like a plague

    • MycoPete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      21·
      10 months ago

      I have a MacBook in my closet I can’t use at all because of an Nvidia integrated GPU. I’ve had nothing but problems with their shitty software too. Never had a single problem since I switched to AMD, and it was wayyyy cheaper. Your issue sounds like PEBCAK to me.

      You know opencl AMD installations have problems if you have previously installed Nvidia software? So it sounds like your experience with AMD was soured by NVIDIA actually, and then you went out and gave them more money.