Hans Niemann was accused of cheating after he beat Norwegian grandmaster Magnus Carlsen last September.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhhhmmm, I don’t want to be intrusive, but how exactly does one use small beads to cheat at chess? I’m trying to figure this out, …but I keep losing anyway.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. The whole comment section seems like it’s super obvious… but seriously… how does one cheat with anal vibrators?

      • DakkaDok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s important to remember that he is certainly still very good at chess, even if he cheated in some games. He wouldn’t need to have every move given to him, it might even be enough to give him a single signal that there is a non-obvious great move in a current position. Even just knowing that would probably be enough for him to find it by himself.

        • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a good point. You wouldn’t need to send an entire move. If you simply sent a message indicating which piece is the best to move, the player probably can find the place to move that piece.

      • cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        One possibility might be: a number of buzzes assigned to each piece type, followed by 2 sets of buzzes for coordinates. Actually swapping those could make him even faster if the piece is implied by the coordinates. It’s unlikely he doesn’t know the coordinates like the back of his hand so they could deliver them at a high rate. He still probably needs to be somewhat good on his own though for the endgame when his clock is running low.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is mostly correct (standard chess notation is slightly more compact than what you described; a typical move looks like “Nf6”, meaning kNight to F6. Normally there will only ever be one piece of the appropriate type that can reach any particular square, so only destination coordinates are needed. If it’s necessary to say which piece, then you just give origin and destination, but omit the piece, since it’s implied by the origin, so moves are typically 3 characters, never more than 4).

          As a form of cheating, the use of what are generally called “thumpers” has been around for a long time. In casinos you would have a confederate sitting at an angle where they can see the dealer’s hand, who would then signal to you what moves to make. In chess they would be watching the game, constantly plugging every move into a chess program like Stockfish, and then signalling what move the computer chooses. Your opponent is effectively playing the computer, not you.

          Typical thumpers are a vibrating band that goes around a leg, or something hidden in the sole of a shoe. All you have to do is sit there and look thoughtful while you decode the message, which is most likely sent using Morse code. Where the sex toys come in is this wild theory concocted by the internet that a really good way to hide a thumper from any kind of frisking would be to use a Bluetooth controlled anal vibrator, since no one is likely to frisk you there. There’s no proof that it’s ever happened, but now it’s a huge meme that chess is basically stuck with forever.

          And yes, time is still an issue. Good players can move a lot faster than the time it takes for all that back and forth communication. The strategy, if someone ever suspects they’re playing a cheater, is to play defensively and run out the clock.

          (edited for clarity)