I’m never putting one of these in my home.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I work for Amazon.

      This has been the case for many years. Amazon has used AI in Alexa and other services for many years as primary providers, and has told it’s users it’s used it’s data for as long. We’re talking from close to inception here, so 6-7 years, at least. Hell, LLM’s aren’t even new to most big tech companies!

      I’m all for privacy, but if you want privacy then you probably shouldn’t have a fucking tin can in your house that actions every conversation to a cloud service!

          • EnderMB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Considering I set up one of the content types that relates to wakeword and utterance text analysis for Alexa, I trust it completely.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              But can I trust you? Are you willing to share the source code?

              Edit: Tell me why I’m suppose to trust an internet rando?

              • EnderMB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re right to be distrustful, but there’s a fine line between a healthy distrust of a closed ecosystem and blind worry/cynicism.

                Obviously I’m not going to share proprietary source code. Even if I did, it would mean very little without knowing the upstream and downstream services. What I will say is that Amazon is at least honest about what it’s services do, even if it’s in the fine print. Customers are able to delete their data when they choose to, and if they do, there are serious (internal) consequences when stuff like data deletion and DSAR aren’t followed.

                • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Also, it would very little without also inspecting every chip on the board. You could have easily written safe code, but the audio signal could also be intercepted before it gets to that point.

                  Alexa doesn’t solve any problems and only exists to make consumption easier. It’s not something I need to trust because it’s not something I or anyone else needs.

      • Balder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well,that’s the thing with “news” right? Just scattered information without context for clicks. If people start connecting the dots and things make sense, most of the news become pretty uninteresting and would not evoke anger, prompting you to click and share.

    • maegul@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Harsh but true. We need some tough love in our relationship with tech.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, that’s kinda the point. They literally tell you that your voice interactions are used to improve the service.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I will be the last person to not have a smart home. There will be a banner over the doorway: “Welcome to Stupid House”.

    There will be a small cover charge.

    • Maestro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can have a privacy-first smart home. I have. I run Home Assistant in a docker container. No external services/plugins. My smart doorbell streams to my local nvr. If my internet is down, everything keeps working. And it’s not even that hard anymore. It’s become a lot easier over the last 2-3 years. Still not for non-techie users, but a lot better.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That sounds pretty reasonable.

        Edit: Still kind of want to call my place “Stupid House” for myriad other reasons

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not tech illiterate by any means, and everything after “home assistant” in that post is Greek to me

        • Maestro@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Docker is a way to run containers. Basically lightweight virtual servers. That makes it easy to run multiple servers on one machine. An NVR is a network video recorder. It’s like a video security system like they use in stores where all cameras are viewed and recorded in a single place. I assume you know what a doorbell is 😄

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Have any resources to get started with that? Been looking into security systems but don’t fully trust nest/ring/simplisafe etc

      • LoafyLemon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Teach me your ways. Setting up Home Assistant seems like such a daunting task. I’m stalling converting my devices into it. Any tips for a beginner?

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I just followed the steps on their site. Containers give me cancer, so I did a real install on my home server.

          Caveat: I am a professional software engineer (but I didn’t really have to hack anything)

    • Patius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      When skynet comes online, I’ll die quickly, being mopped to death. You’ll have to struggle in the post apocalyptic hellscape where humans fight robots with A-10s for some reason.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    haven’t we all known this since product launch ?

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think most people, me included, underestimate the scale of the operation. When you hear “company will use private data to do X”, you imagine what a reasonable person would do, like random sample a few conversations here and there. In reality they record everything permanently over months and years, far beyond what would be necessary to run the service.

      It’s kind of crazy how we get this level of surveillance while still having software that will lose your data if you don’t hit Save often enough.

      • brlemworld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What’s fucked up is if you try to regulate it and make these companies have data retention policies. It creates a giant moat around them where no newcomer can have a chance to compete.

        • biofaust@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s because you are not enforcing data portability at the same time. Having studied and discussed the GDPR at length within tech circles, I became convinced that data portability is the ultimate right and the key to ensure continuing innovation

          • gamer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            data portability is the ultimate right and the key to ensure continuing innovation

            Interoperability in general is the solution to walled gardens and monopolies that harm competition, consumers, and innovation.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        that’s fair. i work with data for a living so that probably biases my perspective

  • muertinez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    not sure how much they’ll learn from me screaming “you dumb bitch” at it

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    The new Amazon AI is going to be remarkably foul-mouthed. Every time it screws up (and it screws up a lot) I have to curse at it to make it shut up so it can hear the command again.

    • ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      I brings me joy when I tell her “Alexa, shut up you dumb bitch” and then she responds with that sad minor tone dejected sound.

  • maegul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So who thinks this conversation here on lemmy isn’t being used to train an AI? Maybe not right now but later?

    Sure the relatively small size of lemmy means it might not be scooped up and trained on. But the point still stands. All that is publicly online is food for the big-corp AI builders. And while Alexa invading your home privacy is obviously a shitty thing, I’m not sure we’ve all thought through the new relationship between us, the internet and the big AIs.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well I know I have no expectation of privacy here, but I’d rather open source LLMs train on my words along with proprietary ones, than some company hoarding information and selling it to each other.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The only thing an AI trained on Lemmy will ever be able to do is discuss the merits of socialism and talk about Linux lol

  • Orionza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    We always knew that. What they don’t tell you is your phone is also secretly listening. “Ok Google” <- turn that thing off too

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I love being able to dictate a grocery list but god damn is she stupid.

      Good luck asking for cream cheese and chive crackers without ending up with cream cheese as one item and chive crackers as another. Or worse peanut butter and honey crackers as peanut butter and then honey crackers

        • blackluster117@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The problem is that Alexa isn’t actually parsing the meaning of the total phrase, she’s taking each individual word as it comes. With that context, she would just as easily interpret your phrasing as “thing with thing on the side”. You’d still get chive crackers, honey crackers, peanut butter, and cream cheese.

          Edit: I thought about this a bit more, and it seems to me the only way Alexa could actually understand what you wanted is if you said “chive cream cheese crackers” or “peanut butter honey crackers”. You have to implicitly make it one item and not a potential combination of multiple items.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah I had the same realization as I was reading this:
            you can not add Boolean terms and expect it to not separate it.

            So run on nonsense sentences are your friend and will definitely make the training from you so much more useful.

  • Rognaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, I realized these things are terrible about a year ago. So, I hacked them into computer speakers using some cheap amps and a 12 volt power supply.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    An always on microphone connected to a company that is mostly known to exploit their customers and employees! Say it ain’t so!

  • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’ll be really good at telling people to shut the fuck up if it’s using my data for training.