• CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thank fuck. She was such a fucking piece of shit to be hogging her office like that when she was clearly too old and senile. Good riddance!

    • Poteryashka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      10 months ago

      Can’t make her own decisions so needed to give power of attorney to her daughter, but can make decisions that would impact millions of Americans and international politics

    • Milksteaks [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The most based take here. Get these old fucks that couldnt possibly represent us out. Term limits and age limits are needed badly, and these fossils need to get the fuck out of office and let new blood in

      • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not a fan of term limits, but age limits absolutely. Once you’re old enough to get social security, your time as an elected or appointed official is done. And no, we should not allow people to run who will age out while in office.

        • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          65 is way too low, especially an effective 59 while running. Just make it 80, with an effective 74 for candidates. There are plenty of highly capable 70 year olds.

          • payzdom@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure there are plenty of capable 70 year olds, but mid to late 70s is where dramatic health changes is very short periods of time and diminished mental capacity starts to be commonplace. 65 as an age limit to run (meaning the oldest senators could be 71) makes a lot of sense.

            • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I feel like any lower than absolutely necessary is a problem, because of how important gaining power within the Senate is. Its uncommon to become a senator before age 50 (currently 10 are under 50), and it can take 2-3 terms before you get to be head of committees. I think you could make the hard limit 75 to run, with anyone over 70 subject to some sort of yearly test both physical and mental, the results of which are public. 75 because they’ll still retire at age 80 that way. As long as they can prove competency, we should let the most experienced people take the reins.

    • melechric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      It was painfully apparent she was confused after returning to the Senate earlier in the year. This is a clear-cut case of manipulation. Also elder abuse.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m just going to throw this out there: if she was too old and senile, was she actually in control or was she being controlled?