Uber, Grubhub and DoorDash must pay NYC delivery workers an $18 minimum wage::New York Acting Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Moyne rejected a bid by Uber, DoorDash and Grubhub to block a bill requiring a minimum wage for app-based delivery workers.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The sad thing is that they’re probably just gonna shut down shop there and hurt these workers. Not justifying their low payment at all. Just fuck. Capitalism is fucked up.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If they leave, people are still going to want food delivered. The job still exists. Uber just isn’t there to skim their money and squeeze drivers dry

        • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Restaurants used to just have their own delivery drivers. Crazy, right? Like Phillip J. Fry.

          I delivered pizza and later Chinese food for years, working directly for a restaurant. I get the sense you got a way better level of service from that arrangement, as well, versus the Uber Eats randos you get these days. You sure as shit did from places where I was a driver.

          • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Quality of service from UberEats and DoorDash kind of sucks. Bags are often left directly in front of the door, so you can’t open the door to get it without smashing everything. Sometimes after an hour they just seem to give up and cancel. If the restaurant doesn’t have something, they don’t reach out, you just don’t get it, or get some other random thing… then you have to reach out to the app for a refund, but dinner still sucks. Sometimes you get some other persons meal, again, no real way to fix it…. Get a refund and hope their taste is similar enough to tolerate. Sometimes the driver is a smoker and the meal smells and tastes like smoke… but too late, already tipped. Then, they send out emails saying you report too much stuff as being wrong, and claim you’re taking advantage of the system and that this money comes out of the hand of hardworking people… basically trying to guilt you into not reporting real legitimate issues with the order. How about DoorDash or Uber pony up the cash when the system they put in places break down and suck shit.

            Lots of first world problems, but still really annoying, especially when it comes at such a premium price.

      • PeachMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Doubt it. NYC is an enormous market, 10 million people (20 mil if you count people that commute to NYC for work). They might add extra fees, though.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, they’ll just add yet another surcharge to the meals. Food through DoorDash is already at least double vs getting it yourself. What’s a little more. They’ll probably look at the average deliveries per hour and use that to divide up the $18… then pad it a bit to make sure they don’t come up short. Corporate will likely turn a profit on this, unless is makes orders drop significantly. But I have to assume the regular delivery customers are pretty price insensitive.

        • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The point is realising that you can pay a liveable wage and still be profitable.

          So if all this happens, that’s great.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I get the legal distinction between 1099 and W-2 worker but it’s pretty crazy that it’s allowed to pay someone below minimum wage because of that distinction.

    Like, SOMEONE is doing an hour of labor, and it’s allowed that they get paid less than the minimum wage? Is there actually any reason we as a society should be OK with that, or is it just a legal technicality we can’t get rid of without making a bunch of plumbers making $80/hr fill out paperwork ensuring they make more than the minimum?

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    How does this work with the way these delivery apps work?

    Correct me if I’m wrong since I’ve never worked for one of these outfits, but the way I understood it was anytime you want to work you just log into the app and make yourself available, and you randomly get assigned nearby jobs. If there are no jobs to do (middle of the night or w/e), then you get no pay. With this change, when are you eligible for the minimum wage? If everyone in NYC logs into the app at once, will everyone get minimum wage?

  • tidaL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    How will they prioritize volume? Or can everyone join and make 18/hr all at once?