• MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That actually almost seems worse. He is not paying into Social Security or his local community. He is being generously compensated on stock, which is taxed differently.

    Edit: I do want to thank you for providing that link. I was only finding a Forbes article about him being the highest compensated CEO of that year.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s paying in the local community through property taxes.

      He’s highly compensated through stock and when he bought twitter. We got some huge amount of money in Taxes.

      You’re correct. He rarely pays into social but that’s a problem for Congress to solve.

      There are many ways to solve this bullshit and one is not allow them to borrow against their stock. That’s how they live for so cheap. I’m not opposed to stopping that at all.

      • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Borrowing against stock needs to stop yesterday, especially if it’s not specifically for the interests of the company whose stock is being used.