• Icaria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    NZ already did this and it is the most cowardly way to avoid political blowback.

    There’s plenty of other options for minimising smoking. A more altruistic way is by lifting people out of poverty and tackling social disintegration, since smokers are overwhelmingly poor and disaffected.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your right there are better ways. Both methods should be implemented. A carrot and stick approach is going to be more effective.

      I don’t think we can expect the altruistic way from a Billionaire Tory. As far as policy goes, this is the best one the Tory have had in a long time. But that doesn’t say much.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So instead of reducing a clearly destructive habit now we should wait for a major social change that likely won’t happen. I don’t see how that is more altruistic for the “poor and disaffected”.

      • Icaria@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can either try to do things the right way and cure multiple social ills, or you can do it the wrong way and end up with different rules for different adults all in an attempt to prohibition your way out of one issue.