• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Would those environmental protections have allowed the wall to simply not be built, or would they have just delayed it, costing even more money for environmental reviews, changed plans, etc., when a government shutdown is imminent?

    That’s a real question, to be clear, and not one the article answered one way or the other.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even if it were the case, as they said the budget is already allocated. Why not make them waste as much of it as possible paying for stuff that isn’t building the wall that everyone knows is useless? Making it look like even more of an expensive boondoggle seems like a better strategy than paving the way through federally protected lands.

      And that’s setting aside the costs of maintaining what gets built or what it would cost to remove the wall at some point.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Excellent points. This is completely braindead policy on Biden’s part. The reality is he wanted to give this money to the contractors building the wall, and it’s pathetic crony capitalism per usual.