This would save young Americans from going into crippling debt, but it would also make a university degree completely unaffordable for most. However, in the age of the Internet, that doesn’t mean they couldn’t get an education.

Consider the long term impact of this. There are a lot of different ways such a situation could go, for better and for worse.

  • alokir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m from a country with free university education and we also have student loans available.

    Here’s something that works for us: forget about private universities, invest in federal or state owned collages so that they can compete with the private ones.

    Do a scholarship program where students can get free entry into these universities if their grades are high enough in high school, or make it dependent on an entry exam. Those that don’t get in have a paid option that’s still partially funded by the state or federal government.

    Student loans will still be useful, not for tuition but for families who can’t afford to send their kids to study in the cities where the universities are located.

    • Synthead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The sad part about relying on scholarships is that disadvantaged kids are much less likely to have excellent grades. These people need school more than anyone else. The system works backwards.