I guess not strictly news - but with all of the vitriol I have seen in discussions on the Israel situation, that have boiled down to arguments over wording, I feel that this take from the BBC is worthy of some discussion.

Mods, feel free to remove if this is not newsy enough.

  • steventhedev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    You asked by whose law they are defined as terrorists. You got your answer: UK law, EU law, US law.

    The BBC answers to UK law at the end of the day, not Gazan law, not US law, and not your law.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The BBC answers to UK law at the end of the day

      Actually no, the role of journalism isn’t just to parrot and re-express the views of the current government from where they are based.

      • steventhedev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree they shouldn’t parrot the views of the UK government blindly. But the BBC are not above the law. Stop that nonsense.

        Hamas is a terrorist organization. They organize and commit acts of intentional violence against civilians with the express purpose of spreading terror.

        Calling them anything else other than that is a disservice to the readers of the BBC and implicitly condones their actions by not labelling them as such.