• Knightfox@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not really, the images and travel descriptions you’re reading here are the exception, not the rule. The US has great infrastructure, just not for public transportation as there isn’t enough centralized usage and the locations are far apart. It would take me 4 hours to go to work by bus, but it takes me 25 min by car.

    • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like it’s a vicious cycle. There isn’t any public transport so there are no people using the public transport which causes public transports to be bad, so there isn’t anybody using it

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is to a point, but when you reach that point it’s just not feasible to have public transportation. The city I work in has a light rail train, it has a robust busing system, but people also travel from 20+ different small towns around this one and at a certain point that system breaks down. If I were to take the bus I would still need a car to get to the next small town where the bus stop into the large town is.

        The fact is that the most of the US isn’t designed like old world cities which were built with public transportation and foot traffic in mind.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s simply poor route planning, which could be solved by better bus funding, leading to more buses with more stops and more frequent trips.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “great infrastructure, just not for public transportation” sounds to me like another way to say “shit infrastructure”