• WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      the same organisation makes both, they just release a subset of their work as the open source version of WordPress. it’s a pretty standard business model for this kind of software

      • ToRA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        That is incorrect. Automattic donates some work to the open-source project, but they are in no way the same thing.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Man this is like saying proton isn’t made by Valve… Matt Mullenweg was one of the cocreators of Wordpress and went on to start Automattic which is a pun on his name. He’s literally got (or at least had) the title of lead developer in the Worldpress Foundation and he’s CEO of Automattic.

          • ToRA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I didn’t say it’s not “made by”, they clearly contribute plenty, just like many others. The issue is that a non-profit entity should not be used as an advertising platform giving preferential treatment to a single for-profit business.

            The WordPress Foundation clearly states that you can’t use the name WordPress in your domain or business name nor use the logo for your business (https://wordpressfoundation.org/trademark-policy/) yet that is what Automattic does and Automattic or WordPress.com is not the same entity as the WordPress Foundation or WordPress.org. That is illegal and unethical.

              • ToRA@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Not when you are a non-profit. You cannot run a non-profit in a way that only provides special benefits to a person or group and exclude others.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Donates some work? They open source the platform. You can pay for hosting at .com… honestly asking, what are you even mad about?

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Feels like the typical “I shouldn’t have to spend money for things!!!” attitude that goes around on here.

            • ToRA@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              WordPress is a free and open-source software provided by a non-profit organization. WordPress.com is a for-profit business and a completely separate entity. What Automattic is doing is illegal and unethical.

          • ToRA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because WordPress.org is a non-profit that is clearly being treated as a puppet for the WordPress.com for-profit business. It’s not just “they also open-source their software”. They are separate entities. It’s literally illegal and obviously unethical.

            • blazeknave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              What laws are being broken? You use adverbs like “clearly” and “obviously” to make your point but they’re not helpful. It’s not obvious. What is unethical?

              • ToRA@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                Nonprofit organizations are not allowed to divert undue benefits to any person or organization.

                It is obvious and clear if you know the bare minimum of non-profit organizations.

                Do you actually not understand the basics of non-profit organizations? If so, I’m not sure why you’re butting into a conversation about the subject. Otherwise you must be arguing in bad faith.