• frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it was for previous charges after she violated probation. But yeah, if we’re going to talk about endangering a fetus, then everyone who had a hand in her jail conditions and who ignored her when she went in to labor should also be in prison because every one of them is guilty of endangerment.

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      No she was one of several women imprisoned under a new Alabama statute for “chemical endangerment of a fetus.” You know, a “crime” that already can’t be committed again by the time the imprisoned reach trial for it because of the way our “justice” system works.

      Those women aren’t allowed to endanger a fetus, but the all-knowing authorities are, apparently. (Yes, let’s forcibly cold-turkey detox a pregnant person who was using. Great idea.)

      • frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I read the article last week and misremembered what the 15 years was for. Either way, not one person was actually interested in protecting her fetus.

      • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        a “crime” that already can’t be committed again by the time the imprisoned reach trial for it because of the way our “justice” system works.

        What do you mean? The article says that she has faced several chemical endangerment charges over the years.