I’m a person living in a rural area and have to either go by train, the nearest station being 15 mins away by car and the trains having a schedule that keeps fluctuating.

Or have to go by car where it takes 60 mins to get where I need to go. I wouldn’t want to get a late pickup or anything outrageous just something to get me places.

I’m not a car enthusiast or anything like that.

  • schnapsidee@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Owning a car if you need one is not in itself a problem. “fuckcars” isn’t about blindly hating cars, it’s about being aware that cars are inefficient, dangerous, and bad for people’s health. It’s about raising awareness about how car-centric and car-dependent society has become, despite there being better ways to structure transportation.

    • Cinnamon@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for the clarification, so what I’m hearing is that owning a car is fine if it’s not something outrageously large or inefficient and I don’t have good public transit connections?

      • schnapsidee@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not some kind of cult setting rules for how people should live. If you need a car, buy a car, if you want to own some kind of ridiculous lifted truck, you can do that, but I’ll reserve the right to make fun of you and think you’re an asshole.

  • Yoast@notdigg.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think everyone here understands that most people don’t live in northern Europe with great cycling and train infrastructure. So you do what you got to do to live a happy life in car infested capitalist society, nothing wrong with that. If that means you need a car, get a car. Preferably it’d be used and with a low ride height / bumper height. So it’s at least a bit safer for cyclist and pedestrians.

    I think all we ask is that when there is an opportunity to advocate for more pedestrian or cycling infrastructure that you do so

  • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    FuckCars is not about BEING carfree, it’s about realizing that you’re FORCED to have a car, to pay $10,000 per year to own that car, to breathe in the pollution from the roads, to risk your life on the road, and how bad that sucks.

  • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or course it is. Also, it’s ok to not literally fuck cars. It’s just a sentiment that we wish cars didn’t have to dominate so much due to poor civic planning.

  • Otome-chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    the “fuck cars” mindset is typically that we’re against car-dependency, not against people who are victims of car-dependent societies. Naturally people in suburbs and more rural areas, especially here in america, will need a car. It’s not ideal and it’s something that should be fixed but it happens.

    • balerion@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. Blaming individuals for systemic problems never gets you anywhere. If you can reduce your car dependency, sure, do that, but don’t beat yourself up if you can’t.

    • tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I think this is kind of a problem with fuck cars communication. It really needs to be clear that it’s against car dependency.

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I’m a “fuck cars purist” I’m not a fan of cars at all. But yes, the movement is very much about car-dependency, not cars.