• hiddengoat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    And yet every asswipe with an internet is whining about how Starfield is too much like Bethesda’s other stuff.

    So are they getting too far away, or are they doing the same thing?

    Get with the other dinks and figure it out.

    • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh? Chill dude, no need to call names. People are allowed to have their own opinions on a piece of media. I can assure you I’m not part of some kind of Starfield-hating cabal. I just didn’t like it. Sorry.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Hey entire internet, get on the same page already!”

      I hate it when anyone whatsoever disagrees with anything, no matter how unimportant.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It all depends on how old you are basically. It shares more blood with Skyrim than it does Oblivion or Morrowind. It’s also procedural, like Daggerfall and Arena, but done poorly. Those had procedural dungeons, while Starfield every dungeon is the same and it’s only the boring open world that changes.

      It’s like their other stuff, but in most of the wrong ways in my opinion. Its got the (lack of) dialog options from FO4… I was going to point out things from other games, but the rest is all generic and applies to all of the modern ones.

      It lacks the player control and agency from Morrowind or earlier that personally I’m looking for. I hope with the success of BG3 they realize they can give players freedom and options and they’ll appreciate it.