🌻

Exhibit A: Youtube premium

I wasn’t trying to prove what would survive, merely show how resilient life can be. If a simple microbe is guaranteed to survive in hell, something more complex able to behaviourally adapt/relocate is likely to as well. The greatest danger to complex life is having nothing to feed on.

Tropical fish might have to survive in the Arctic Ocean, or grasses in the northern prairies, insects of a zillion different types and sizes. Life, uh, finds a way.

We won’t kill everything. No matter what we do. Life will continue and more of it than anyone thinks will, even of the plants and animals. It is humans and most of the large animals and intolerant plants that need fear the impending Climate catastrophe.

I feel as though the assumption that humans had the ability to kill all complex life like some people suggest is exaggerating the significance of humans

It absolutely is. There are microbes that thrive at the bottom of the ocean in the boiling acidic conditions of hydrothermal vents. There is absolutely no way anything humans can do at this point would kill ALL life on the planet. There will absolutely be some specialist microbe somewhere that looks at whatever we did to the planet and says ‘yup, now is my time to shine!’.

🌻

As if they haven’t always been stories or not.

Google Translate Version

Best I could find, myself not being fluent in Russian, is this human rights/legal organization still operating in Russia proper which describes the conviction as a result of delivering homemade fliers saying ‘do we really need this kind of President’.

By all means, reveal the evidence that was presented which you claim is being suppressed. I have no problems admitting I’m wrong in the face of substantiated evidence.

no scrap of evidence for this was produced.

I would absolutely love it. Used to be an FLO and all I can say is carrying a stack of HE Shells would be stress free. Nobody rushing you or even being remotely discourteous. A team of escorts tackling anyone that even looks in the direction of my path, let alone attempts to walk in the way…

Thank you for making my job a little easier today :)

I actually read the referenced articles.

Fact: WWII was almost 8 decades ago. Japan, France, Italy, Brazil all are not Nazis.

Every nation has an element of Far-Right wackadoodles in their midst. To call Ukrainians nazis is as racist as calling Poles communists because they were a part of the USSR 40 years ago.

What evidence? I see zero reference to any evidence other than the word in the title. Nonsense. Reading the NYT article (which should have been the actual article not this blog post BS) the closest you get to anything Western related for breaking the negotiations is their advice that the initial tentative agreements ‘were tantamount to capitulation’. Negotiations proceeded long after that point and 2 key issues with them are attributed to their breakdown:

1. Putin’s micromanaging of his negotiation team led the Ukranian side to doubt the negotiations were anything but a stall tactic, and

2. A deal-breaking Russian amendment to Ukraine’s Article 5-esque ‘guarantors will come to the aid of Ukraine if they are attacked again in the future’ which essentially gave Russia a veto.

;tldr the only evidence provided by this blog post BS is for Russia not negotiating in good faith, and definitively being the one that spoiled the talks with a garbage ally defence veto amendment which strongly indicated they had every intention of doing all this again anyways no matter what the agreement said (their SOP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ukrayinska-pravda-the-ukrainian-truth/

but but… mUh LeGaCy!