![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/1b634197-101a-4e37-9ade-769a14d6f018.png)
And especially that research about transgender was among the first books to be burnt.
And especially that research about transgender was among the first books to be burnt.
They started by calling China socialistic. What more do you need lol
I’m sorry, but you fell for lies and propaganda. China is an authoritarian state capitalism that uses its its money for buying influence in the global south with colonialistic intent. No difference to western nations, just way more authoritarian.
Signal an Duckduckgo or Startpage
Yes, he did
I love all of them. And Stargate.
I know, but that doesn’t matter, because my point still stands. U.S. americans often act like the U.S was the whole world an it’s annoying.
I love it when U.S. americans word stuff like the U.S. was the whole world…
And… Blocked and reported. Bye Felicia.
racists (seemingly like you)
Go fuck yourself. Complaining long acronyms would keep people from supporting civil rights movements and then presume or imply someone being racist for disagreeing with you. Go fuck yourself.
And the worst thing is you seemingly don’t even know shit about the topic you’re talking about yet call people racist. This discussion is over.
That’s just wrong. The Rainbow Flag represents LGBT Pride and does not include BIPOC.
I don’t know why you don’t like the progress flag, but it’s not racist and it’s not transphobic and it’s not segregating. It highlights the diversity of human rights movements and points out that all human rights movements have the same goal and should work together.
I feel more includet in the Progress Flag than the standard Rainbow. That’s just me, but why should that be less valid?
George Lucas ripped off Dune, and that pretty blatantly. No need to search for more hidden ripoffs.
That’s completely beside the point. You said, renewables were only cheaper because they’re subsidized. I proved you wrong and showed that nuclear is subsidized. That has nothing to do with companies being for-profit.
You argued against an argument I didn’t make. That’s the definition of a strawman.
Your one and only fact-related statement was literally
but nuclear energy isn’t as dangerous as some make it out to be.
But sure, you weren’t talking about dangers lol.
You’re right, you shouldn’t have stepped in. At least,you shouldn’t have stepped in and build a strawman. The discussion you entered is about costs, not dangers.
Nuclear is more expensive than the others only if the others get subsidies but Nuclear doesn’t.
That is straight up wrong, the opposite is true. England’s Hinkley Point C for example has a Contract for Difference, the british government pays a guaranteed price per kWh so their citizens pay less.
LCOE of solar is lower than nuclear for eleven years now. Wind has had lower LCOE than nuclear for 14 years now. See figure 52.
Building a new nuclear power plant takes 9-12 years on average. Hinkley Point C in southeast England was announced in 2008 (16 years ago) and is projected to be finished in 2028, with costs now being estimated around $40 billion. These long realisation times are not a european issue alone, as Korea’s Shin-Hanul-1-2 faces similar problems.
Safely storing nuclear waste is expensive, too.
I was a bouncer when the first kids born in 2000 were allowed into clubs. That hit differently.