The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
I know nothing about you or your situation, but food allergies can really mess up your life, and they’re often overlooked (speaking from experience).
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
I know nothing about you or your situation, but food allergies can really mess up your life, and they’re often overlooked (speaking from experience).
It was Celiac for me… It’s such a relief to be able to make a change and do something about it instead of “just getting on with it.”
Just straight up arguing for ethnic clensing and the complete expulsion/murder of an entire people, eh?
Evolution is not ‘survival of the fittest’ but rather ‘survival of the good-enough’.
Great news, terrible article!
Well said. Lawful engagement is the only way if anyone is going to hold that kind of power. American hegemony has proven itself thoroughly hypocritical, time and time again. It’s attack dog in the middle east is holding the leash. Rule of law must reign - but never forget its our collective responsibility to write and uphold just laws for the collective.
You must be this tall to ride.
Making a deal with the devil to rule a world, or just to get a tenure track position.
There really is No True Scotsman. Well done.
I think this is actually one of the most in-touch posts I’ve ever seen by a business. It was posted here, wasn’t it? They knew.
Yeah, and as someone lse mentioned: they often have a Libby service that gets you tonnes of free audiobooks and other digital materials.
Both can be true.
It’s very unlikely to happen, but Canada effectively shares a huge border with Russia via the north. It’s not Alaska or bust, and there’s been a decent amount of talk about Arctic security in the last decade or so.
It’s classified as a dwarf planet, and is among (a debatable number of) other, similarly sized objects.
That’s exactly why I came to Lemmy: different trash.
Navigating the politics of their own domestic Nazi sympathizers, perhaps.
As someone who prays to see a ‘may contain’ statement alongside a ‘contains’ statement on the potentially risky food I’d like to eat: I vehemently disagree. “May contain” seems to always mean “contains some”. Without it, I’d have no way to know if there’s a real risk of cross contamination.
Well the chart could be showing a constant mass with decreasing happiness.
That sounds an awful lot like restaurants and jobs…