thats not a sustainable amount of horsepower for a horse, but it is for an engine. Notably engines are better at moving heavy loads for longer and uphill. The name is misleading though. It should be like “sustained horsepower”
thats not a sustainable amount of horsepower for a horse, but it is for an engine. Notably engines are better at moving heavy loads for longer and uphill. The name is misleading though. It should be like “sustained horsepower”
This is a start. Its an admission they’re doing something evil.
Hot earth theory
nobody is going to arrest you for using the word, and many people will celebrate you using it. The problem is those people are mostly assholes. The word you should be thinking about is “audience”.
The hard fact is OpenAI is already exposing itself to lawsuits by training on copyrighted material.
So the proof here should be “what makes them trustworthy this time?”
chatgpt won’t save anything? Doubtful.
why do they need this vehicle?
Winshaw, his theoretical antiperson.
Found a hole filled with tiby credenzas. Now I know what kind of bee I’m dealing with.
y2k the transparent plastics were when electronic manufacturing took pride in its products. (though I much prefer modern user interfaces)
we are starstuff we are universe milk
Babies. Criminal babies.
Too big to fail companies should be dismantled. Either put those fucks in jail or take away their toys. This slap on the wrist shit is weak and it only encourages them to take dumber risks
ah yes biden, the uh president of new york?
I think the sticking point is this: if people can’t reproduce it then you missed writing down an important detail and therefore didn’t finish step 3.
The elitism is thinking peer review suffices for reproducibility.
Corollary: If it can’t be reproduced you’ve failed to write down something critical.
Liken(sub)scribe
Lik(uns)cribe
Licrib(e)
Lickrib
industrializing meat production should have always been banned - we should just have allowed livestock in cities
thank you