Something something leopards something something sobbing something face.
Something something leopards something something sobbing something face.
I’d say it depends on the environment. TTRPG tends to attract analytical types and when there’s actual roleplay, is effectively an exercise in taking on the perspective of others. As well, classical RPG fare tends to come down hard on people who act in an oppressive way.
There are many video games that are exercises in empathy (That software company), looking at the bigger picture, and sorting through noise to figure out what’s going on (Torment, Disco Elysium). Additionally, mega corporations are so vilified as to be useable as comedy (Portal). Additionally, there are games which paint the government as morally gray (Control, and yes I know but still).
Then, of course, there’s Fallout.
Games like this are useful because they are narrative simulations; they let you try out different ideas by playing them out. As long as there is some critical thinking and/or media literacy skills present, engaging with these will challenge right wing thinking on different levels.
Nonviolence is an inherently privileged position in the modern context. Besides the fact that the typical pacifist is quite clearly white and middle class, pacifism as an ideology comes from a privileged context. It ignores that violence is already here; that violence is an unavoidable, structurally integral part of the current social hierarchy; and that it is people of color who are most affected by that violence. Pacifism assumes that white people who grew up in the suburbs with all their basic needs met can counsel oppressed people, many of whom are people of color, to suffer patiently under an inconceivably greater violence, until such time as the Great White Father is swayed by the movement’s demands or the pacifists achieve that legendary “critical mass. – How Nonviolence Serves the State
Critical support for the collection of Dims, Ghosts, and Gimmees just trying to make a better life for themselves.
Now who can argue with that? I think we’re all indebted to TheFerrango for clearly stating what needed to be said. I’m particulary glad that these lovely children were here today to hear that speech. Not only was it authentic Star Trek technobabble, it expressed a courage little seen in this day and age.
Yeah. Commits going right to prod makes my skin crawl.
Took me a while to track it down, but I think this is the book to which you were referring.
https://angryflower.com/348.html
I make no cleans about the stances of this artist; I just saw this strip years ago.
Alan Tudyk would have been a good Stamets, but Anthony Rapp has been perfection.
The dominance is in service to private profits. They keep telling about “America and it’s interests” where the “interests” involved are profits.
Time for testing then 😊
Is there an option for being Evil Overlord List compliant?
The left wing of the right wing. Sounds right.
Seriously, has anyone heard of (for example) Allen Turing? That’s a famous case of how the West treats queer people, and that’s the snowflake on top of the tip of the iceberg.
Which is why Warhamster is a yellow flag for me. Media literate friends of mine enjoy it for the deconstruction of fascism it is. Most people didn’t have that kind of media literacy and they’re easy pickings.
And of course the image they use is Joseph Smith 🤣
This should be fun. Let’s watch in real time how the ThEy ShOuLd FoLlOw ThE rUlEs people suddenly stop carrying about rules.
A lot of my head canon around this and the notable lack of automation prevalent in Starfleet: it’s a futuristic, post-scarcity jobs program. Yes, it’s about exploration and rendering assistance and all that. But it gives people something to do, a way to serve the whole. Picard said as much to Geordi when Scotty was aboard. I’ve of the many things Starfleet does is give people a sense of usefulness.
John Lithgow looking weird.