They’re talking about pulling it open as in the pic, which makes it get cold, let’s all the goodness fall out and ruins the dippiness imo.

But you do you, I’m not your abuella.

It’s a birria taco but your point still stands.

I’d be pretty surprised if this didn’t have something to do with the Great Green Wall project, even if it’s a knock on effect of that work.

It’s a reference to a film called The Thing.

ingredients to a recipe may well be subject to copyright, which is why food writers make sure their recipes are “unique” in some small way. Enough to make them different enough to avoid accusations of direct plagiarism.

E: removed unnecessary snark

Yeah, I was thinking the same tbh. All you can really say is whatever it is has 3 syllabuls, it’s so muffled everything else is pareidolia.

I hear “KA-MA-LA” pretty clearly there, I really can’t make it out as “lock him up”.

Or you really like studying worms. But that would be whataboutism wouldn’t it?

Thank you, I came here to snark about this being a once every odd year activity for valve. But you’re absolutely right, it is a gaming landmark and it has an active and devoted community. And it’s one of the few games of that kind that still exist from that time that allows the community to add new content and play in and around it.

I also really hope they continue to support that too.

So, you’re in favour after Thatcher then? Because you make it sound like a direct competition.

Yeah? Well this is razzle dazzle camo I think we all know who’ll be seen last.

He’s the 37th of the Dirtnapbrian clan, I thought that was obvious.

Here you go :)

And the links:

OG Twitter(x)

Insta with pic

What does relatively soon mean Supergiant Games? WHAT DOES RELATIVELY SOON MEAN???

Monty Python isn’t satire

Ah ok fair enough, I just found it confusing because the two have the same spelling but completely different meanings and uses.

In the first context it’s kind of synonymous with “wish” right? So implying that anyone would replace the will (as in willpower/willed/willing etc) with “won’t” in that example is a bit confusing, because that would never happen. In the same way you’d never replace “wish” with “won’t”.

Edit: just wanted to say I have zero education in this area, I’m just a native speaker, but I love reading these threads when they come up as it helps me understand more about the language too.

It’s not clear if you did this intentionally or not but the “will” used in your example “The psychokinetics will the object to move” is not the same kind of “will” used in your other examples, it’s this one meaning “to create using the power of your mind”.

It’s a bit of a nitpick but I thought it worth mentioning as OP seems to be trying to learn.

Anyone born after 1983 can’t cook. All they know is charge they phone…

I think it’s Norman Bates from Psycho.

The burden of proof is on you there bud.

If you want to make extraordinary claims like “I came into your room and implanted your memories”, then you’re going to have to provide some evidence for that. I don’t need to do anything.

You’re also completely missing the point of the original post and my response. There was never any questions about whether memories are real, the question was whether the memory of a thing has the same value as the real time experience of a thing.

(Also, at least I’ve got a prosthetic brain, you’re clearly still on the waiting list :p)