Log1cal_Outcome

Probably because this country is a shit hole. There’s nothing to do, and what little there is costs far too much money. Even a visit to the local costs a small fortune.

Elaborate.

Yes, like Palestine. I don’t believe that was in doubt.

You are absolutely right, it doesn’t give them a right to wage war on the Palestine people. Although Israel can and should ‘defend’ itself, it has gone way too far, killing thousands of innocents for no apparent gain. It is a disgusting over use of force and should quite rightly be condemned.

I would argue however that Israel isn’t a colony of Europe or the US, that would imply control over the country and as has been quite apparent, Israel is making it’s own decisions and will happily shrug off any criticism from the Western powers. Using words like colony just derails the narrative you want to imply. It is a country created after the second world war (rightly or wrongly) and the horrors of the Holocaust. Does that excuse Israel now? No, absolutely not. If anything I should think they should know better.

Israel needs regime change and a willingness to work with those that surround them and the same goes for Hamas. Religion, ideology, ethnicity, it’s all an excuse so easily used to justify violence and unfortunately I don’t ever see it changing.

I appreciate the attempt.

I mean, Jewish people originally heralded from around the eastern Mediterranean, middle east? That would make them historically middle eastern rather than western. Or are we strictly talking about western powers giving the Jewish people a ‘homeland’ after the second world war and the holocaust?

Lol, sipfo

Not denying anything. Not my problem if you don’t know the answer.

Let’s assume your narrative is true. Where is Charles in the decision making process?

Charles has committed genocide?

The civility is somewhat lacking.

Most subs seem to be afflicted.

That’s quite the hot take.

Who did what now?

Jesus, lemmy is full of hate

Owned by the French state toboot.

My idea isn’t about exposure, but experience, and I said they would be paid. They won’t get paid as much as a 10 year designer but some beer money seems reasonable and they have some work for their portfolio.

Contact your local art college and see if there are any students looking for work experience and a bit of cash.

In some ways I suspect the AI tech wont be the problem, more the limitations of game design. But I’m no dev, what do I know!

A co-op game set in a open/sandbox fantasy world that is truly alive, driven by AI. You can do as you wish, join a Kingdom as a soldier for example, set up a village somewhere maybe. Become a trader. Hunter. Whatever you want. The ultimate open survival game I guess.

But the key part is behind the scenes an AI will change the story of the world as time passes. Perhap on the other side of the continent a war wages between 2 factions that threatens to pull the whole region into termoil. Maybe you’ll hear about it from a passing traveller. Maybe you won’t hear about it at all and the next time you go travelling far and wide you realise a new Empire is rising.

Perhaps the AI decides to slowly bring about the collapse of society through climate change. Perhaps you become embroiled in a plot to assinate a King. The AI decides all the variables, you can only react to them, maybe you can try and change the story with your actions.

One day you are out hunting and you see in the distance an army marching to war. Maybe you decide to catch up and join the army. Or maybe you’ll hide and hope that wherever that army is going, it won’t come to your neck of the woods.

The AI continuously evolves the world around you to keep things interesting. Every game will be completely different.

It’ll probably never get made, it is massive in scope.