I’m sorry, but this is a silly statement. This is by no means an ADHD thing. It’s a pattern understanding or logic

I’m trying to teach my kid this. Not to use this specific method for addition, but recognize and understand patterns in math.

That’s neat and all. But how do they retract their heads?

IKEA furniture are not bad at all. 40 years ago or was a standing joke, but the quality has quintupled since then.

You can of course buy the cheapest of cheap in IKEA and it will be less comfortable than the more expensive ones, but couches from IKEA are good.

Hell, most other furniture brands delivers their furniture flat packed as well. It’s just easier to build IKEA since they have gotten the instructions down to a t.

When I saw the story about furniture doctor here the other day it just seemed so dumb. Buy flat packed furniture sand assemble it on your living room. Or get the furniture doctor to assemble it, then you don’t have to cut it open with power tools…

In short - IKEA and Wasa ftw!!

For anybody like myself who doesn’t know enough ancient greek… Lithos means rock…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithobraking

I hope it was a genious piece of code that was miles ahead of what it replaced.

And still it got rejected 😄

Well… How do you define what a group of ppl look like? Are all Japanese of the same descent? Can an immigrant not become Japanese? How would this play out in the US? Only native Americans could represent the country? Or are you inferring that a given number of years must pass before a new skin tone can represent a country?

Most likely its a payment plan for purchases. Klarna is a company where you can delay payment and such. They are a third party connection, so I believe a webshop will not know that is input on Klarnas end. But who knows how Midtgård does in their checkout process…

Right. So it’s a Schroedinger’s quote…😑

But thanks for pointing out what was obvious for others

The fuck? Where is your limit then to purchase power Vs donating to those less fortunate?

I mean, if 40k USD is your limit, what about housing? Boat? Would it be ok to have ten 4k cars? Two 30k cars?

Can you rationalize drinking that imported beer last weekend when you could have given those 15 bucks to a homeless guy on the street?

I mean, arbitrary set a value point for a car as excessive creates more problem for you and your ideal then not having that limit. At least the Buddhist monks who give away all their worldy goods to focus on meditation are consistent.

This is the quote:

“I don’t see any scenario where they’re responsible for less than 10% of the value destruction, so around $4 billion.”

In my head, he is comparing the minimum size of ADLs value reduction to be 10% or 4 billion. 10% of 44 billion is 4,4 billion. In this comment he is not saying anything about the current value except that 10% of 44 is around 4.

How else can you read it?