What is the benefit of smaller reactors? It seems like they would be worse in just about every way? Wouldn’t smaller reactors be less efficient as you need more sites/material/personnel to generate the same power? Wouldn’t needing more sites also make logistics and regulatory approval more difficult?

Sure, but I think most people would just like to play the game on the system they already have.

Not releasing on PlayStation solely because Bethesda is owned by Microsoft, and MS want to sell more Xboxs, is anti consumer.

Free/libre software is not the same as open source, but I agree that it is difficult to enforce prohibitions with source available.

Lightning shall smite thy wallets.

Yes, a ~3 trillion dollar company milking users by not including a charger, making them purchase a proprietary cable and a bag full of dongles when a more capable open standard is ubiquitous, is good actually.

The fact is, people need phones and many are buying from Apple. The legislation gives some very minimal protection to non omega nerds so they get ripped off slightly less.

But I’m sure your elders are all very interested in learning the technical differences between the 100 phones on the market in their final days. You should give a weekly Keynote on Lightning cables at their church meetings.

Nukes have nearly been launched many times. In the Cuban missile crisis event you reference, only ONE OF THREE refused to launch. I do not understand how any of this is supposed to be confidence inspiring in any way.

Collaborative disarmament is the only solution.

Storage Templates. Photos are stored in subdirectories categorized by date.

CLI Import. It looks like you may be able to import your albums with the cli and --album flag, not sure about exporting though.

If you only need cardav/caldav functionality, Radicale provides just that. Can be deployed as a container and works flawlessly with DAVx5.

In most cases, income is taxed, not wealth; property tax is an exception to this rule.