![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/881dc672-1a6f-417f-a18a-84763e525b41.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
Again, you’re putting words in my mouth. I’m done engaging with you as I don’t think you’re conversing in good faith.
No one said anything is beneath senior employees.
It’s a lost opportunity when you, a staff engineer, spend your time doing something that a junior engineer could do – instead of doing a task a junior engineer can’t do.
It’s faulty, short-sighted logic though. If every company trained juniors, only for them to jump ship in two years, there’d be a pool of trained juniors to hire from. Yes you wouldn’t get your investment out of that particular person, but you’d be hiring someone else’s investment.
Beyond that, there’s work that is better suited to more junior employees because it’s literally a waste of the senior employees’ skills.
Too many industries are shitting on entry level employees now… They’re easy targets for layoffs and easy targets for AI, apparently. Now they’re already complaining about the lack of quality talent.
If you don’t invest in the next set of entry-level employees, you won’t have the next set of qualified employees.
Am I missing it, or is there no way to organize the Drawer, either by folder or tab?
So we’re going to ban TikTok so China can’t manipulate us, but continue to allow corporations to do the same.
Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.
“Monday”.length is working JavaScript and does equal 6. No print command afaik though.
Yeah. The maintainer said in their blog post they’re looking for a license that lets people read the code but not fork it. Isn’t that just standard American copyright?
Edit: Looks like they went with CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). So not an open source license and one that CC themselves recommends not using for software.
This blog from the maintainer makes it clear they have no interest in open source other than to advertise their own skills
Appreciate you giving credit where credit is due. It is 100% corporate greed.
I generally have to disagree on it being disrespectful. There’s an inherent cost in any business relationship that has to be accounted for with low volume partners. Every company that offers volume discounting does it for this exact reason – the price per piece doesn’t change, but the other costs can be spread over more pieces.
Could Valve eat some of this cost to promote indie development? Absolutely. But it’s not disrespectful to price your product with volume discounts.
Thanks for your comment. I usually travel alone and was like “why would anyone subject themselves to AirBNB.” I appreciate the context and perspective.
But you didn’t use the word normal / plain / vanilla. You used proper, which is a loaded word.
Why the editorialized title? Why not use the one from the article?
Interesting article! I can’t tell from the post, though, is this due to a limitation on bots in Matrix or that no one has invested to make a similar bot for Matrix?
Apparently the idiots are mad that official mod support hasn’t come fast enough and that official patches break unofficial mods.
That sounds like a great reason to threaten someone /s
100%
I program – yet I’ve been asked to fix a camera and Apple Maps.
They mean jank:
jan·ky adjective, informal adjective: jank
of extremely poor or unreliable quality.
"the software is pretty janky"
The library hadn’t had any updates in 2 years before this. Clearly it wasn’t maintained. If you’re a user and bothered by this super edge case “vulnerability”, fork it and take on the responsibility yourself.