![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
You may also want to checkout xilem
You may also want to checkout xilem
Actually that’s one of the few cases, where a (distributed/decentralized) blockchain really makes sense (trustless ledger which can be used for incorruptible/transparent political systems)…
Ignoring all the buzzword bingo and hype.
Less consumerism, more focus on real social aspects:
This! I feel it myself, my ADHD was much better when I stayed in a relatively natural setting with only little technology. for a few weeks (I did some programming there though, and boy was I focused in complex problems without medication etc. had one of my best coding sessions there I think). I’m pretty sure that a lot of ADHD but also other psychiatric issues like autism or social anxiety etc. that is diagnosed these days is because of all this unhealthy environment we have created. Or in other words, our modern technology promotes psychiatric issues such as ADHD, autism, social anxiety etc.
I’m guessing it has to do with money laundering/tracking etc.
This is the way
Yes this is my main complaint too with Jerboa, scrolling just feels sluggy, I tried to look into the issue/source-code, but couldn’t find the source of it. When Sync came out, everything was buttery smooth and I was sold (though I’m not the biggest fan of the interface, maybe I’ll switch to an open-source client again, when there’s a more robust less sluggish client again).
Rust has exactly the same problems with depreciation as many Frameworks rely on experimental features which are subject to change.
Rust has actually quite a good record with depreciation and backwards-compatibilty etc. They are changing the language in non-backwards compatible way over editions, but the changes are mostly very manageable.
But to not end up being another C++ (syntax-wise it’s a disaster IMHO), a few non-backwards-compatible changes every few years are the way to go, when it’s manageable.
There are of course security flaws, we’re humans after all. Unless the compiler and the language can be proven mathematically correct at least.
But as described above, in practice the security flaws are easier to isolate in Rust compared to C# IME. The current story of security flaws in Rust is quite good so far.
I’m not speaking for Rust level performance. I’m using Rust nowadays, because it’s generally doing a lot right, that other popular languages struggle with IMO.
Think about error handling. I think even Java is better here than C#. I think it’s quite a mistake, not being required to add all possible exception types that a function can throw to the function signature.
Then the next thing, I really hate about almost every popular language is implicit null
. To be really safe, you have to check every (non-primitive) variable for null
before using it, otherwise you have a potential NullPointerException
.
Then take pattern matching, this is a baked in feature of Rust from the beginning and it does this really well (exhaustive matching etc.). There’s “basic” pattern matching in C#, but it just doesn’t really feel right in the language, and is not even close in capability compared to Rusts.
All of this (and more) makes Rust the less error-prone language, which I can say with confidence after long experience with both of these languages (both > 5 years).
I’m honestly not sure why exactly C#
was chosen for most of the games, but it’s probably because it’s relatively good to embed, is relatively strong-typed, while being somewhat performant (compared to something like python or other scripting languages).
I mean why else would you want to use C# when there’s Rust 🦀 and all the awesome tooling and libraries around it…
Well, or even more effective, just put your clothing into water. I even have a vest that is specifically designed for that:
You’ll put it into water and evaporation is keeping you cool with a relatively stable temperature. For example: I sat around a few people who were clearly not “enjoying” the heat, while I was quite comfortable (and I’m really sensitive to heat and would normally escape hot places instantly).
Come to Austria everything is so much better here /s
(I’m not sure if there is a country where there isn’t a drift towards stupi… ehh “right-wing conservative politics”)
Does it really?
I mean it seems like you have made your mind up around getting a boob job done, although almost everyone here tells you to not do it…
I don’t get why women do this to themselves. I guess she was pretty once. But those tits are completely out of place and don’t make sense, and these lips… Why would you ever even think about putting silicone in your lips…?
Seems just like an expensive health hazard to make yourself unpretty and loose a lot of money.
But I guess this is all subjective (though the the objective majority seems to have similar thoughts).
Honestly I’m quite a bit less attracted to women that have a boob job done. Natural is much more attractive to me (boob size doesn’t matter that much). I doubt, that I’m the only one.
Yes, I feel long-term damage will be more interesting. If there are viable alternatives, people may migrate over, a large part of the reddit community still knows what happened, and I doubt that with the current CEO that reddit will succeed long-term
Is this finally the year of Linux “Desktop”…?
Yeah he’s a legend in CS… Muskrat just further rides himself into being the fool of centuries