I used to love Vivaldi, but eventually it being a chromium browser forced me to switch back to Firefox and it’s children. If they switched over to using Firefox as a base rather than chromium then I’d consider it.
I used to love Vivaldi, but eventually it being a chromium browser forced me to switch back to Firefox and it’s children. If they switched over to using Firefox as a base rather than chromium then I’d consider it.
Exactly. This is all about people trying to come up with a technological solution to retain the same unsustainable lifestyle we already have become complacent with. It’s just not possible; we can’t keep consuming over what’s feasible and wonder why the consequences of overconsumption keep coming up.
That definitely doesn’t sound ominous. “The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.”
I wonder if it’s some sort of rationale for keeping the corn subsidies while also framing it a a greener alternative to crude oil extraction.
Edit: After actually reading the article, yes this is the case. Apparently their proposed methods emit roughly 50% less emissions, which I think might be worth it depending on how much is expended to grow the corn and process the fuel. You could be right in the end though but if there are less emissions in general, it might be worth it.
It sounds like they made their own bed with preferential treatment towards Manjaro.
It largely depends on the program. If the application has native Wayland support then it usually works pretty well, but apps that only run on X11 (which need to run through Xwayland) may be a little glitchy. It will depend on a lot of different variables including drivers, model, libraries, kernel, etc. But later this month Nvidia is to release new drivers that allow “explicit sync”, which should address a lot of this I believe.
Does anyone know why they won’t hear this case?
Ooh or “gender = null”
I have to agree with you. From my perspective, it comes off that they don’t think the Trans/POC portion is important and replace it with their own logo while keeping the rainbow and chevron. They could’ve easily added their own logo to the right but replacing the other colors is in very bad taste to me.
I’m guessing this is related to breakdowns in trade between the US and OPEC.
Looks like it’s mainly China, India, and Indonesia that are increasing usage for industrial products and power generation. Europe increased a bit last year but is expected to drop and US rates are dropping.
I think we need to go a step further. The article I linked earlier touches on how several natural carbon sequestration systems rerelease carbon seasonally or have other implications. Seagrasses release carbon when water is warmer than usual. Trees release carbon during forest fires or from natural decomposition, and even potentially cause local atmospheric warming due to a low reflectivity. Artificial methods of sequestration are necessary, whether as systems that directly capture atmospheric carbon and store it or as systems that interrupt the process of natural decomposition or combustion and divert it to storage or further processing.
That’s a fair concern. I hope that becomes less of an issue as we incorporate more sustainable energy but unfortunately it seems that coal and gas lobbyists don’t want to give up without a fight.
We will likely need both carbon reduction and sequestration to actually be effective in reducing carbon emissions in general. Here’s an article that touches on that and as well as goes over concerns about relying too much on carbon dioxide removal.
How would you ban it?
Where are you seeing below 50% efficiency?
There’s a link within that article that would presumably go to the source of those numbers at “https://recycleutah.org/what-the-styrofoam/” but it seems like that article is broken on that site.
Not to doubt that those numbers are accurate (it’s probably worse honestly), but the citation for that quote leads to a broken link on a Utah recycling site. It probably mostly goes to a landfill but they were probably saying that 30% of the total makeup of US landfills is EPS; not that only 30% of all EPS actually gets there.
I might give it a shot. It looks like a good alternative. Thanks for the recommendation.