Sure. But that does not make it unethical.
Sure. But that does not make it unethical.
That is a very interesting research area.
Several countries have this, across device types. It works great.
It is time to rename the company. OpenAI is not open anymore, and has not been for a while now.
I love flavours of weird.
Ja så er det da til at forstå hvorfor du ligger på førstepladsen 😉
Maybe because most mammals don’t menstruate. Only humans and a few others do, like bats and some apes.
I believe that is very very far from true. Do you have any source on that?
This is not a diagnosis test. You do not have ADHD just because this described you. However if you have ADHD there is a high likelihood that this describes you.
I agree, it is much more clear. I do like Free also, but it is confusing in English.
It has evolved of cause. One of the sources you referred to, the OSI, has a clear agenda to define the term open source software according to their own definition. They are advocating that we use the term in the more narrow sense as you described, rather than the more original broad sense.
The Wikipedia article basically just cites OSIs definition. If you dig into the talk page on Wikipedia it is clearly a disbuted definition that is currently written.
While I absolutely am a proponent of free, libre or open source software, no matter what we call it, the narrow definition OSI suggests of open source software is still not how most people understand the term.
Narrowing the term open source software the way OSI proposes increases the confusion, it doesn’t help.
You are cherry-picking quite a bit in that Wikipedia article. There is also a whole section discussing the confusion between the terms open source, free and libre.
I would venture that the most commonly understood definition of the term is that open source software simply means what it says, that the source code is openly available. And nothing more.
Free or libre software expresses the intention you describe explicitly, that the recipient is allowed to share and modify the software. Thus removing ambiguity.
Open Source is indeed a term existing for many years, probably a lot longer than you are thinking about. Trying to redefine that as meaning anything more than what is says is what is causing confusion.
Exactly. Also it is interesting how I am getting downvoted while you are getting upvoted - even though we are saying the same thing.
No I am using the term for how it was originally used, back in the free software movement days in the 70s and 80s.
Open source means nothing more than the source beeing open for all to see. What your are describing we called Free Software or later FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) but the open source part is redundant in that acronym.
Also some started using Libre instead of Free, as Free sometimes are confused with Gratis. That is where the expression Free as in Freedom cones from.
If you can look at the source code it is open source.
Did you see the report? Quite a lot of rockets fired from Gaza fails and hit somewhere in Gaza.
No doubt about that. All I am saying is that just switching to EVs is a great first step. I absolutely hope we start seeing more non-car cities in the future.
Is this not classical overwatering symptom?