One could argue there aren’t enough pixels and the artist just “filled in the blanks”
One could argue there aren’t enough pixels and the artist just “filled in the blanks”
Girl just starts slayin’ like there ain’t nothing to it! It was always a choice!
Ah, nice! I tried to avoid powershell while on windows, so don’t know much about it.
You can get all the IDs using yt-dlp
yt-dlp --flat-playlist --print id <playlist>
Assuming you’re on linux, you can add at the end to save the list to a file. ids_all.txt
You can also add
--compat-options no-youtube-unavailable-videos
to get only the list of available videos instead and then, again assuming you’re on linux, do
diff ids_all.txt ids_available.txt
to get the odd ones out. That’s the simplest I could come up with. You’ll have to hope you can use the wayback machine, or a good old exact search to turn up what video that ID actually referred to
But will you be punished for not telling them that the key is under the mat? They will get in either way. They can get into your hard drive with brute force too, it’s just a wee bit more trouble for them.
This feels weird to me. If your password is “ILikePotato”, which is then used to decrypt a text file that contains “IStoleTheMonaLisaAndReplacedItWithAPhotocopy”, how is that any different in terms of “incriminating yourself” than if it was the other way around…?
And if you actually forgot your password, that’s 3 months jail for you, because they’ll hardly believe you? Better have just one so you’ll surely remember!
I wonder, if you use special markings to keep track of your illegal doings, and one of your notebooks is found during a search, are you required to assist in deciphering the contents of it? That’s basically the same thing as decrypting your hard drive.
Idiocracy is when people want to role-play in a role-playing game
In Jerboa, clicking on a comment on a now deleted post gives an error, but looking at it in my profile the three dots are there, and I can still remove or even edit it.
free =/= free
OP means libre software, as opposed to “shitty bloated proprietary software”
I think the DF creator said he would open source it when he is finished or no longer able to work on it (i.e.: dead), but we’ll see how that goes.
There’s a million alternatives that do the exact same thing. Fastfetch is just better, since it’s still maintained, and not painfully slow. I used to think neofetch being slow was kind of cute. Then I switched to fastfetch, and now I can’t bear the years neofetch takes to run.
what are your strategies against such sites tracking you?
Close and never go there again. If I’m bit enough times, it goes in the hosts file for blocking. If I really need the stuff on there, I try archived versions on web.archive.org or archive.today
Geez, just refund every game every two hours like a normal person.
Mint handled my 1060 really well and it’s really good on arch too with the newer driver. Still just running Xorg with cinnamon, though. I guess mileage still varies with this stuff.
Is it HURD’n’ time?
My buddy was in a class doing a programming test. It was a couple minutes until turn in time, so he went to zip up the source files. He had already ran the appropriate zip command previously, so he pressed up three times and then enter. It appears he had miscalculated, because the command that ran was rm *.c
. There were no backups.
My point was that it’s not so much “fair reasoning” as just a statement of that fact.
That’s just saying “we want to sell access to our code, so we can’t make it open source”. Basically the definition of proprietary software, no?
I agree and always write it like that at first, but it’s also true that for example fifty kilodollars (50k$) just looks better as $50k
…although it might just be silly enough that it works…