![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/32fe2921-f124-44ac-b9eb-fdec1442e3d1.webp)
So excited for this. Out of all the awesome stuff, I honestly think I’m most looking forward to the items that expire. That’ll be super interesting to design around.
So excited for this. Out of all the awesome stuff, I honestly think I’m most looking forward to the items that expire. That’ll be super interesting to design around.
Damn it, we lost him again. You win this time, Froggo, but one day you’ll pay for what you’ve done.
I don’t do this very often, but when you see Garfield sucking on John’s toes… how do you not?
take up subsistence farming
Where?
Heck, now I want pizza…
And not only that, but if you spritz leftover pizza with a bit of water before putting it in the microwave, it brings out the flavour more and prevents it from drying out.
(Figure that’s about as relevant.)
Those are two very fair points - I agree.
I’m not sure I understand what you mean.
For an API there should always be a version parameter/endpoint, imho.
Edit for further context: Ideally, a parameter.
You’re in luck! The book I’ve generally heard recommended to beginners for Python is available for free online!
Make more money that way.
The biggest reason for me is that it’s less data to send over a network. Especially when I’m working with lists of objects, including null fields can add a noticeable chunk to the payload.
There are some cases where it might be worth it to differentiate “No value” and “No attribute”, but in most cases they can be treated the same, since the data should really be validated against a schema anyway.
Yeah, I’m also confused. If an attribute is null, I would prefer to simply not serialize it.
I’m sure there are edge cases where someone might prefer to include null attributes, but generally they should be treated the same either way.
I say we ditch this nonsense altogether and go back to vague descriptions of the Sun’s position in the sky.
Ngl I love programming assembly, that game seems right up my alley.
Honestly I wish there were less communities. I’ve said this before, but people treat Lemmy like late-stage Reddit, expecting niche communities for everything, and we end up with hundreds of communities with no (or one, if we’re lucky) active members.
This problem is then amplified by the fact that these niche communities are split even further across several instances, so our userbase ends up completely dissipated.
I would love to see users focus on a smaller number of more general-purpose communities. Of course, these should still be shared across instances, but I think we would benefit a lot from having, say, a “video games” community instead of 500 specific game communities.
As a side note as well, I don’t think we shouldn’t be “allowed” to create more niche communities (though if an instance admin wanted to regulate, that’s their call). I think this should be more of a user culture shift, if anything.
Can’t wait for the sequel where Zelda puts on Majora’s Mask.
The only way to play, imo.
One I haven’t seen mentioned (at a glance at least) is Noita.
Getting the “false ending” is achievable with some effort, but I dare you to actually finish the game. And as far as replayability, you’ll be hard pressed to have two runs that go the same. The amount of Butterfly Effect in this game from all the combinations and systems is straight up insane.
I really can’t recommend it enough.