Yea but once or twice every decade in one outlet clearly wasn’t what I meant 😂
Yea but once or twice every decade in one outlet clearly wasn’t what I meant 😂
Nothing I would disagree with. Sound thinking and a well written piece. However, this needs to be published in the Telegraph, Daily Mail, Mirror, and the Sun rather than the guardian for it to do any good and change attitudes. Next the guardian will be telling us that champagne tastes nice 😊.
Sean Bean obviously
Saw this guy and the cat Bob during their rose to fame. Pre book, pre film. Utter cunt. Very aggressive with people and literally told my friend she couldn’t look at the cat without a donation.
What a waste of an opportunity he was given.
Surely at this point you’d make your own Google Drive and sync your notes to there? Clearly relying on a third party API isn’t working for them financially so stop doing it. Some S3 storage and a backend isn’t that difficult and could be run for pennies.
I’m not sure from this blog post why they can’t do that?
I tell you hwat
Open thread… nope on comments. 🤣
Six times income! Fucking heck.
Build more houses you bastards!
Wasn’t it a case of them ordering Elon to comply with the law, he played silly buggers with them by meming a response, so they started to take his assets away and he was like… wait no shocked Pikachu I will comply.
I like how oddly specific you are about the hair do. Noice 👌.
Nano bots!
Surprised that Ireland isn’t on this list. Surely they need loads of data centres for all the US companies they shield from taxes 😉.
Get tested ASAP!
Oh, and tell your wife incase she needs to get tested as well.
You can use OpenOffice which hasn’t adopted any new UI since 1998.
This is clearly a piss take list.
Exactly. Love the username BTW.
The best use of AI at the moment is to act as a tool to quickly search and present data quicker than humanly possible. Not to act upon the findings blindly.
It’s not as easy to say anyone using AI should be fired. There needs to be a more nuanced approach to this. It wholly depends on what the GP did with the information it presented.
An example: back in the day GPs had a huge book of knowledge they would defer to that was peer researched and therefore trusted. If you came in with an odd symptom they’d spend time (often in front of you) flipping through the book to find that elusive disease they read about that one time at university. Later that knowledge moved to a traditional search engine. Why wouldn’t you now use AI to make that search faster? The AI can easily be trained on this same corpus of knowledge.
Of course the GP should double check what they are being told. But simply using AI is not the problem you make it out to be. If you have a corpus of knowledge and the GP uses this in a dangerous way then the GP should be fired. But you don’t then burn the book they found this information from.
This gonna turn into a Blade episode for sure .
I tell you hwat, I’m gonna wup your ass son.