“Humans are just imperfect crabs.” - @pH3ra@CubitOom@lemmy.ml
Trying to be the best crab I can.
so I looked into modded minecraft via curse… seems awfully clunky - and so many mods are really compilations of others… can you recommend top few mods?
The only one that seems interesting from a player perspective is trees falling when cut.
‘homo sapiens’ is a less evolved species than modern people, something we out-evolved.
who the fuck is thinking this and why?
20 Yeats
0.o that’s a lot of irish drama.
joking aside, I need to rewatch this because I recall it being gorgeous. it and The Cell are both wedged in my ‘even if it’s not a great film, it’s a feast for the eyes’ category.
will be used by people who have no intention of making art.
I think you mean ‘people who have no intention of paying for art.’
I am so happy with the vast amount of free art available these days. As a blogger, it’s easier than ever to find a free topical picture.
dirtbag
trick question. you can’t die on venus if your body is dissolved by the acid-mosphere and your space craft implodes from the atmospheric pressure.
“New generation of engineers” is a bit cringe.
a new sense of urgency is more like it.
wonder if it’s a magazine release setup so they can be dropped individually
THE WORLD IS NOT FINLAND.
Unless you’re volunteering to take the world’s radioactive waste, stop thinking the world is finland, jfc you’re worse than an american
And yeah, storage pools WORLDWIDE are being used as defacto permanent storage. That’s what you call it when you have no plan to move the shit.
gonna block you now, you’re either too dense to realize there’s a whole world outside your tiny country, or deliberately obtuse.
The ammount of radioactive waste is tiny relative to normal dumps, and as described before, it is easy to deal with, dig a deep hole, put the waste in it, refill it.
Boom problem solved.
I wish it were that simple. Meanwhile, in reality:
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/safer-storage-spent-nuclear-fuel
https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002000640
https://blog.ucsusa.org/dlochbaum/possible-source-of-leaks-at-spent-fuel-pools-at/
from the hill article:
So Biden never explicitly made a one-term promise during the campaign
ok. Look I’m not trying to pick a fight, I just never heard biden say that and wondered what I’d missed. The Hill article goes on to state:
but he certainly implied it with the language of “transition.”
yeeaah, uh, I’m going to vote for him because < HAHA FUCKING HELLSCAPE PROJECT 2025 > either way
citation requested thanks
nothing, not a single thing you’ve argued, will in any way reduce the radioactive leftovers nuclear reactors produce and most of the world is putting off for the next generation to fix.
Like climate change.
How many crises do you think those poor kids are going to be able to manage at once?
Trumps replies seldom had any connection to the thread/question posed by moderator. he was simply waiting for his turn to ramble a gish gallop out.
Why doesn’t anyone call him out on lying about running for a second term?
never saw this. citation requested thanks
yeah, I get it, you’re whole hog on it, the enthusiasm comes through loud and clear.
I don’t agree, but there’s no amount of sense that’s going to sway the already decided.
there’s literally centuries for us to figure out a way to make those waste useful for us.
yes, I’m sure we’ll hop on fixing this enormous issue with all the same urgency we’ve treated it with so far…
yep, they’re awesome, and may sidestep some of the HUGE investments in gigantic infrastructure - one day. What you conveniently leave out is no one is doing this yet at scale; china’s got one test reactor going last time I looked.
I personally love the idea, but the nuclear industry here in the US is obsessed with large steam turbine setups in the multiple megawatt scale; even small modular reactors are getting side eyes.
So yeah, it exists, but it’s not going to displace the current tech (which is really 60’s tech with better electronics).
why bother investing enormous amounts of money into a tech that’s already problematic? when there are better solutions at hand?
I’m not anti-nuclear, I just think further investment into it is misguided when there are so many other options that don’t create tens of thousands of years of radioisotopes that have to go somewhere.
good on Scandinavia, the rest of the world isn’t in such privileged positions. As seen in Fukushima. As seen in the hundreds of cooling ponds all over the US.
Thank you very much, I look forward to exploring this!