Yes you do,
Configuration control is a max in this world and you don’t have the control/ability/power to decide which patches go in or stay out. The vendor, the person who has all the power and knowledge, is the one who decides.
You can loose all your certifications or being held liable for any problem due to that policy.
Not even red hat (certainly not a life critical system) allows a different level of patches/state out of their approved ones
I couldn’t disagree more with you. If you are running something REAL life critical the moment there is a patch you install it and deploy as fast as possible. And if it contains any severe patch it is even the vendor who recalls all the equipment with service bulletin and advisory letters.
With life critical you don’t wait the bug to appear because It maybe too late to avoid deadly consequences.
Take wiht a bit (or a lot) of salt what I am gonna say. Because undoubtedly I am. Missing something here.
But if what you a already say is true probably you are not restricting anything. The recommended way to do so is with a firewall rule (probably in your router).
You are extending the subnet definition beyond the 16 bits. This can create problems and I doubt that your router will block anything if something crafted is received from Internet.
But of course, being the extremely big address space your are probably safe.
I any case, with a firewall rule in your router allowing only the proxy to go receive connections, you should be good and more standard conform
This is not the Nat functionality as people associated with ipv4, and certainly it is not showing the drawback of allowing the communication only when the NATed client started the communication.
Even if they are alike they are not the same.
I reaffirm myself here. It is possible to have full ipv6 communication and providers do not have cgnats. It is your easiest and most uncomplicated solution with almost nothing to install to make it work.
And in addition, I have to say that I don’t see any benefit in using such functionality at home. If someone can illustrate me a use case I would be thankful
Ipv6
Cgnats don’t exist in ipv6. Nat doesn’t exist in ipv6
What also could happen is your isp blocking some ports from outside its network as a security approach, but normally you can ask to free a range of port from the firewall.
Start selfhosting.
Most of the most useful services can be easily selfhosted. And that’s an incredible amount of info that stays at home
Something that is usually forgotten is that cgnats are only there for ipv4. Running your server in ipv6 is almost a safe bet to have good connectivity.
And you know, these days getting a real ipv4 is more expensive than running in ipv6
It could also be noise on the line, try introducing a ferromagnetic filter (low pass filter) to see if the situation improves.
Check also that the occurrences are not linked with the activation of an electric motor. I one bought a meat grinder that evertyime was on the analogical radio got only noise. And they even were not connected to the same circuit.
Give kodi a try ;)
OK got what you mean.
For avoiding the cases you are describing I use several plugins for the keepass (original flavour) so in my desktop it syncs directly with the cloud.
And in my android I use keepass2androd thst is able to open the database from the cloud too.
Regards
May I ask what is wrong with your archaic setup?
I have exactly the same config and I find it easy and reliable for not asking for a change.
Am I missing some points or what is going on?
Save yourself a headache and use btrfs/zfs with periodically checks as suggested in another post.
Who cares if it is a problem or not when it has a simple and inexpensive solution.
Take a look onto he following image: https://i0.wp.com/www.techjunkie.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/tv-size-distance-chart.png?ssl=1
There is always a subjective component in this kind of discussions but this image will help you to see if yiur setup will make sense based in the real perception of the human eye.