![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/6d56629c-a7b1-465d-8b58-ad77926e3a41.png)
You’re a saint. Not everyone thinks like you.
I clicked before seeing your comment but I had to commend you anyway. Have a good one, mate.
You’re a saint. Not everyone thinks like you.
I clicked before seeing your comment but I had to commend you anyway. Have a good one, mate.
assuming all 4 of us log on, a herculean feat
Majority of you are parents is my guess 💀
Not sure if it’s implied by I’m assuming you are looking for American schools?
God’s work, son. 🤝
Be the change you want to see ✨🌈
Draft
and write in the description that management says this should not be merged until the site breaks.So… How are things at work?
This is what I imagine the Reddit developers think of themselves as. 😆
lol, you’d really have to go out of your way in this scenario. First implement a way to get every single permutation of a list, then to ahead with the asinine solution. 😆 But yes, nice one! Your imagination is impressive.
So there’s yet another level of quirkery to this bullshit then, it seems. 😆 Nice digging! 🤝
I also noticed that if you surround the curlies with parentheses, you get the same again:
> eval('{} + []')
0
> eval('({}) + []')
'[object Object]'
My experiences in Rocket League can confirm. People being toxic in chat? Tell them something in chat back – get the “tg” to confirm French. Every goddamn time, always the French that are so rude.
Why? Why are they having such a bad day every day? Play a game to have fun ffs.
In node, I get the same result in both cases. "[object Object]"
It’s calling the toString()
method on both of them, which in the array case is the same as calling .join(",")
on the array. For an empty array, that results in an empty string added to "[object Object]"
at either end in the respective case in the picture.
Not sure how we’d get 0 though. Anybody know an implementation that does that? Browsers do that maybe? Which way is spec compliant? Number([]) is 0, and I think maybe it’s in the spec that the algorithm for type coercion includes an initial attempt to convert to Number before falling back to toString()
? I dunno, this is all off the top of my head.
Ah yes, mongo and document databases, forgot about those. Yeah those could be a pain to get data from if there’s no structure. 😅
as long as it’s organized in some way
Right? Organized, structured, same thing, or? A database can’t have no structure, right? I don’t even know how one would create such a database.
Exactly. For every level of abstraction, the abstractor is the high level and the abstractee is the lower level. Those aren’t real words perhaps, but you get what I’m saying. It’s all relative along the chain of abstraction.
How in the hell does anyone f— up so bad they get O(n!²)? 🤯 That’s an insanely quickly-growing graph.
Curious what the purpose of that algorithm would have been. 😅
You can make an unstructured database? I thought the S in SQL stood for “structured”, that it was built into the language itself or something.
There’s a WHOM keyword in SQL?
Could you elaborate on “all over Europe”? We don’t have those in Sweden, it looks very very tacky.
In how many countries have you seen these?