• 2 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle



  • I don’t disagree with your point in general, but this doesn’t make much sense:

    If people suffer from the collapse of harmful machinery, it is the fault of the machinery.
    No one would have collapsed it if it was not harmful.

    A lot of people depend on machines to stay alive, machines that do produce harmful impacts around the world (that may or may not be possible to reduce), like advanced medical equipment that is dependent on semiconductors.

    As a disabled person myself, I prefer if no one has to die.






  • Am anarchist and never voted. I see voting as a very ineffective action at best.

    With that being said, I don’t vote because I have better shit to do. Not out of some principle or belief that I’m doing something effective by not voting.

    I’m against taking part in a community based around refusal to vote, because the point of not voting should be passive. It should be “I’m already doing a lot of other more important shit to fight the State so why bother?” And not “I don’t vote therefore I am having an impact”.

    Just like voting is damn near useless, organizing and campaigning around not voting is also pretty meh.

    Edit: OP isn’t doing a false flag. That’s a pretty common view among anarchists. Especially offline.









  • How do anarchists propose handling public works, healthcare, etc?

    Well, how we do it now?

    During the Spanish Civil War, anarchists socialized many industries. What they found out was that you could just remove people from most management positions and continue work as before. Very rarely a manager was actually needed, and when it was they would simply elect one of themselves to fulfill the role for a while.

    Talking about healthcare specifically, in many countries that have public healthcare, the system is already decentralized. Because it needs to be, otherwise they can’t properly answer the demands from their communities. Again, you just need to remove pointless middle-men and other workplace hierarchies (like physicians being more important than nurses), and stuff tends to get better.


  • The vaccine does not stop covid

    It does.

    It does not make you immune

    Not to all strains, and not completely.

    it does not stop you from spreading covid

    It does, by reducing symptoms like cough, which spreads the virus in the air, and by lowering your chances of having it on the first place.

    and you will have to get another dose after about 3 months

    I haven’t checked this one, but even if true, it’s a small price to pay to not having my friends and loved ones dying.

    And then there are possible adverse effects like myocarditis, especially for young men. All this should be considered.

    Which are extremely unlikely to happen in comparison to dying of covid.

    There are other ways to strengthen your immune system. They should be considered too.

    There isn’t s way to strengthen your immune system, because it doesn’t work that way. You either have a healthy immune system or you are immunocompromised, which may happen when you are particularly fucking up your body with drugs, going through rapid environment changes or suffering with AIDS.

    People with a immune system that is too strong (that is, more aggressive and more wasteful of body resources) actually tend to develop auto immune diseases.

    Most people that have died due to covid have been severely ill, morbidly obese or very old.

    Yeah. And they still deserved to fucking live.

    Eating healthy, getting enough exercise and making sure Vitamin D levels are sufficient will make covid much less dangerous. I much prefer that to constantly getting new boosters.

    Those are indeed good practices that will lead to a healthier life, and may affect your chances with covid (especially exercise if it’s cardio).

    However, COVID doesn’t care. Being healthier mostly means that you can take a bit more physical damage on average than other people while your immune system tries to fight the infection. It will still fuck you up and possibly cause permanent damage.

    Oh, and if you have bad genetics, got wet from the rain in a cold environment, or is just way too stressed out from work? Your chances are pulled down just as much.



  • Yeah, but ecological damage isn’t about CO2. It’s about global ecosystem collapse. Reforestation helps stopping damage to local wildlife, keep bees alive, etc. If we focus only on CO2 we run the risk of falling into technocratic strategies of minimaxing it’s mitigation. All that while ignoring what we are trying to preserve in the first place.

    Trees also help lowering local temperature, and a small but significant part of that carbon will be absorbed by fungi and stored bellow the Earth. And with diversity, they can provide resources for communities such as fruits, teas, and other good stuff.


  • Yeah, I got the same feeling.

    I think there’s also a certain power trip in the fetishism of revolutionary violence too. I think everyone that has practiced some form of combative direct action has felt this power trip. It feels good, but we must not let ourselves confuse the feel good vibes those actions give us with advancing our actual material goals of building a better world.

    And we know how frustrated men love feeling powerful through anger.

    I want to shove this article on some people’s faces haha


  • And if these tanks are 50 times more “efficient” than a normal tree, how much more expensive is manufacturing and maintaining them than planting and watering a tree is?

    That’s without mentioning the resources invested into building those oxigen farms. The fact that this is done on a rich country already tells a lot. Solar panels aren’t made with love and care, but minerals extracted from the earth.

    Also, our problem isn’t lack of O2 or excessive CO2. Our problem is a series of ideas and decisions we make about how we treat the world we’re a part of. One of those ideas, is precisely efficiency above all other things. It’s the same idea that makes market speculators fall in love with “line goes up”. She even makes a point of saying how much more efficient than trees those are.

    Sure, those are efficient in making the air safer for humans, but do they help with other local biodiversity? Do they help fixing the soil? Do they help the global ecosystem as a whole?