• Ooops@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Interesting question here:

    This is obviously worthless against radar detection or thermal vision, but useful against low tech visual shooting (that probably has a very low share success anyway). So what’s the actual prevalence in night vision tech? Does (usually digitally based) low-light amplification make up a big enough share that this is not just another coping mechanism?

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nightvision equipment is very common these days, I would expect a huge number of Ukrainian soldiers have it available at this point. Digital nightvision sucks though and isn’t really used for military applications, it’s still pretty much all analog.

    • Will_Phelps@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      @Ooops @LaFinlandia The paint will certainly make detection harder. Night vision is impressive, yet still is worse than daylight in every way.

      A narrower field of view, loss of colors, need to manually focus, loss of depth perception*, and increased difficulty in using weapons are all downsides. Black paint against a night sky won’t make any of those better.

      (*can vary based on the device/number of tubes)

      • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m honestly a little surprised that there aren’t like “emp rifles” or something that can’t just handle this.