Republican lawmakers in the US are leaning into outdated definitions of obscenity to outlaw drag and ban books too
For five months this year, homosexuality was prohibited in a Tennessee college town.
In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.
The ordinance was essentially a covert ban on LGBTQ+ existence.
Erin Reed, one of the first and only national journalists to cover the ordinance earlier this year, noted that Murfreesboro isn’t “the only community that has these old archaic bits of code that target homosexuality”.
Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list of acts defined as “public indecency” by the city code. The small victory came after officials repeatedly refused to issue permits for the BoroPride Festival, citing the new ordinance.
Also in Murfreesboro-
It is a very fucked up place.
“After prayerful thought and talking with my family, I have decided not to run for re-election…"
WTF, why do these people always blame God when they get caught? God wasn’t responsible for your own shady shit, and he’s not responsible for you cuttin’-and-runnin’.
Morgan Freeman: “But there was no prayer in her thought…”
Cripes. Wtf Murfreesboroites?
These are the religious fanatics attempting to overthrow democracy.
Yeah it’s famously fucked up
Big, tough, strong, straight men too afraid to see other men kiss or hold hands. These men are weak. Gay men are much more manlier.
I mean, if you think about it, gay men are so manly that they are literally into men as men. It’s like double man.
It doesn’t get manlier than that. Literally twice the men.
It’s raining men!
Hallelujah
Tennessee needs this law because without it all the men there go gay.
There’s no hate like christian love.
WE WILL NOT GO BACK IN TO THE CLOSEST!
THEN HOW WILL YOU GET CLOTHES
THE BOUDOIR OR MAYBE A DRESSER
THEY WILL SIT IN A PILE ON THE FLOOR AND I WILL SMELL THEM BEFORE PUTTING THEM ON, BUT ONLY IF THEY AREN’T TOO WRINKLED IN WHICH CASE I WILL USE THEM AS PAJAMAS OR WASH THEM AGAIN.
OR THE FARTHEST
A bit redundant to say “archaic” and “Tennessee” isn’t it?
Depends on the city. Chattanooga has amazing municipal internet, for instance.
The christofascist Lemmy user PepeLivesMatter is gonna be sad
They’re still doing the Pepe thing? They do know Pepe’s creator hates them and killed Pepe in his comic, right?
How embarrassing and stupid of them.
Forechin doesn’t care though
Yep. Seems to have been banned though. Yay!
Obscenity law needs to be eliminated entirely at this point. It’s archaic entirely. Luckily, convicting under the Miller test is rare since pretty much everything has “serious artistic or political value”, but these laws shouldn’t be on the books at all. Needless violation of the first amendment to punish victimless crimes.
Christianity going to Christian
Cowards.
I lived scarily close to Murfreesboro to be reading this. Luckily I moved out of Tennessee back in August, and I hope my friends can get outta there soon.
I lived in Cookeville for a few years, glad I got the fuck outta TN, especially Cookeville. So many racists and homophobes there.
Yeah I went to TN Tech for a year so I know Cookeville :/
In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.
Erin Reed, one of the first and only national journalists to cover the ordinance earlier this year, noted that Murfreesboro isn’t “the only community that has these old archaic bits of code that target homosexuality”.
Erin Reed also cited the appropriate part of the city code. You could learn something from her.
The ordinance in question is city ordinance 23-O-22. The ordinance states that the community “has the right to establish and preserve contemporary community standards.” It goes on to state that “indecent behavior” or “display” of “indecent materials” would be banned by the new provision. Importantly, the definitions of indecency link back to the city codes definition in section 21-71 of Murfreesboro city codes, which states that “sexual conduct” barred under the provisions includes “homosexuality.” The city ordinance further states that any “behaviors, materials or events that are patently offensive to the adult community” in Murfreesboro would also be banned. Finally, it gives police officers the right to enforce the provisions and states that anybody using city funds for the banned events or materials could be charged with further crimes.
The ordinance states that the community “has the right to establish and preserve contemporary community standards.”
I have to wonder if the “community” (and I use that term loosely) enacted pro-abortion rules/laws in '73 when Roe was passed so, you know, they kept up with contemporary standards.
Wasn’t this whole thing debunked as an obscure definition that was never enforced, and was changed weeks before a story about it ever made headlines?
Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list
Yep.
I’m cancelling my monthly donation to the guardian lmao. Ragebaiting like some fox news opinion piece.
In June, the city council of Murfreesboro enacted an ordinance outlawing “indecent exposure, public indecency, lewd behavior, nudity or sexual conduct”. The rule did not explicitly mention homosexuality, but LGBTQ+ people in the town quickly realized that the ordinance references 21-72 of the city code, which categorizes homosexuality as an act of indecent sexual conduct.
…
Earlier this month, following a legal challenge from the ACLU of Tennessee, the government of Murfreesboro removed “homosexuality” from the list of acts defined as “public indecency” by the city code. The small victory came after officials repeatedly refused to issue permits for the BoroPride Festival, citing the new ordinance.So the city was using the ordinance to shut down a pride festival based on the new ordinance’s reference to 21-72 of the city code until the ACLU got involved and they backed down rather than pay for lawyers to fight a battle they knew they couldn’t win in the courts.
Murfreesboro made public homosexuality illegal and was enforcing it until the ACLU slapped them around. How is that “debunked”? You don’t think it’s newsworthy that a city government outlawed public homosexuality just because they rescinded it when challenged?
https://www.facebook.com/boropridetn this is the pride organisers page. On the 2019 event listing they state it is the 4th annual event. They’ve been running pride events in the town every year for nearly a decade. The event occurred again this year, making it the 9th consecutive year.
I don’t see gays being oppressed, I see dumb small town officials thinking they can make weird laws that would never hold up in court and getting immediately corrected.
It’s more shocking to me that there was apparently no law that referenced that definition of “sexual conduct” until now that would have highlighted this bigoted part of the city code thats been there for years.
Was fucking in the street legal? Why is it only on the 9th year of the event that they are getting push back? How many officials were involved in this law passing? Questions the guardian isn’t looking at because they don’t give a fuck, or the answers aren’t ragebait enough.
Part of the authoritarian playbook is selective enforcement.
So it’s still scary, even if it never got used.
It’s the fact that it had to be removed… And that there are plenty of people in government, including the speaker of the house, who actually want it to be illegal to be gay.
deleted by creator
Isn’t this a blatant violation of the Laurence ruling?
Was anyone persecuted for this?
I feel like would be a great town to fuck in the park at midnight. Just more exciting because you could get a small ticket for it.
