Russian President Vladimir Putin is urging Russians to have more children. 
"Large families must become the norm," Putin said in a speech Tuesday. 
Russian birth rates are falling amid war in Ukraine and a deepening economic crisis. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin is urging women to have as many as eight children as the number of dead Russian soldiers continues to rise in his war with Ukraine, worsening the country’s population crisis.

Addressing the World Russian People’s Council in Moscow on Tuesday, Putin said the country must return to a time when large families were the norm.

“Many of our grandmothers and great-grandmothers, had seven, eight, or even more children,” Putin said.

  • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I find it hard to imagine wanting to have kids just so your dictator has more meat to feed into his meat grinder. Perhaps the only good news is Putin hopefully doesn’t have 18 more years in him, so the kids won’t have to deal with him directly, but who knows who will sit in the throne next…

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I doesn’t work either. Appeals to nationalism, religion, and even straight up paying and providing luxury benefits to people, in order to have them start having more kids just did nothing in the long run. The world is different. Your children are more likely to become independent adults when you put your resources into a smaller number of children. The cost/benefits ratio of having large families to produce stability, and increase the chances at least one child will be successful, has completely reverse from 100+ years ago.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Putin will open rape/baby factories for female prisoners next. Just watch.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          That might end up being the scary reality for the women and girls who have been abducted in Ukraine.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          The scale at which they would need to do this would make even forcing pregnancy and birth not really sustainable. Especially when the child are being birthed into the world where the economics are against large fertility rates.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think the irony is that you don’t even need to do something like that. Just open a bunch of “orphanages” that are all about hammering absolute loyalty to the dear leader, offer to pay money for any kids that are left there, reap the rewards in a couple of years. As a double whammy, parents are also free to continue fully dedicating to work.

          Libertarians would probably have the weirdest hate boner if that happened, selling kids (great!) to the govt (horrible!)

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Christ my mind went somewhere else. I thought you were gonna suggest that after they open the orphanages and they get populated they would offer the kids a bunch of benefits once they were of age to start breeding. I bet a significant portion of those kids would take it in a heart beat since the alternative is being kicked out at 18 without anywhere to go or money.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              since the alternative is being kicked out at 18 without anywhere to go or money.

              Legaly, all orphans who don’t already own home, will get one from state. But governor wants 5th yacht too.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Putin will open rape/baby factories for female prisoners next. Just watch.

          If anything, they would outlaw contraception first, before going down that road that you’re describing, not that that road would be successful in either case.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know if or when they ended the Maternity Medal, Order of Maternal Glory, and Mother Heroine awards for having large families in Russia. I don’t know much about the programs, just what a friend who emigrated told me about them (and what wikipedia says)

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re already projecting compassion he doesn’t have by assuming he’d wait for them to turn 18. If he thought it would work, he’d march 5 year olds in bomb vests over the border then have Elon announce that Ukraine kills children.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I mean it’s unlikely Putin lives another 16 years, so even if they’re sending 15 year olds to the front this won’t help the war machine

        It’s more about long-term population loss. There’s a reason combined-arms forces are used and mass infantry assaults are not. Problem is, Russian military hardware sucks for a lot of different and systemic reasons so that option isn’t realistic over a large theater.

        Putin is straight up bleeding Russia out and it’s really sad that this many people are displaced and dying over one man’s ego and lust for his station.

    • rammer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The hate of men will pass and dictators die and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die liberty will never perish.

      Source

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s one way to deal with an ageing population demographic.

    Another way is to perhaps not throw every able-bodied young man into a militaristic meat grinder because you still yearn for the Soviet Union days.

  • Jakdracula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “…so that I can send your children to be killing in my war…” Putin, probably.

  • n0m4n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    Where are these women going to find suitable partners to pick from? The smart ones left or will leave, the others will be growing sunflowers.

  • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Putin seems to be in a competition with Trump for the stupidest authoritarian prize.

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Javier Milei, Matteo Salvini, Boris Johnson, Geert Wilders, Jair Bolsonaro & a frightening whole lot of others have entered the chat.

  • Matombo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Well … I don’t want to say literally Hitler, but …

      • majestic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Not Hitler, not even close. Im not allowing what he did nor defending him, but what Hitler did compared with Putin is major difference. It does not change the fact that both of them deserve a special place in hell

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If this is true, this has to be the ultimate way of not really dealing with the population crisis upon us. Not saying any government is doing a great job here as they are all beating around the bush and not addressing root causes, but this one from Putin has to be the most delusional of them all.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is no population crisis, unless you mean there are too many people. Most of the work we do is entirely unnecessary and only exists to help billionaires become trillionaires. At least that’s the case in countries that don’t need meat to throw in front of bullets.

      Necessary jobs are mostly farming, mining, manufacturing, and customer service. The first two have already been automated to need only a tiny percentage of the workforce they once require. Manufacturing is mostly there as well, and is getting closer all the time. Customer service still employs a lot of humans, but even those jobs are being replaced or augmented with physical or logical bots.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Necessary jobs are mostly farming, mining, manufacturing, and customer service.

        And elder care, which is set to be a real growth industry

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s fair, but even in that there is a whole lot that automation can do to address the ratio of elderly to caregivers. Japan is ahead of the curve on population decline, and they are not exactly fond of immigrants. That has been a huge driver behind the development of technologies for elder care.

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That and healthcare are counted as services iirc, which can contribute to some confusion when you look at 70% ish of the economy being made up of that. But most jobs being created now are like the top commenter said, minimum wage service jobs that don’t meet the needs of employees and aren’t great for customers, either

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The crisis is that without enough babies, there will not be enough young people to support the older people. It is why places like Canada have such high immigration as it offsets the lack of births from Canadian citizens. Now, it is a crisis from a planet health perspective. No. It is the best thing that could happen right now as we really could use less people and their associated carbon emissions, but it will still impact the economy hard especially since it is becoming a steep birth rate decline in so many countries. Feels like a free fall right now and to address is going to take as much change as it will take to fix the climate emergency. Might even have some of the same solutions.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I say this as someone who had lots of kids - you cannot build an economy on a continuous explosion of population. That is ridiculous. There are enough people - the population of the earth has more than doubled in my lifetime. I’d much rather work till I die, than tell someone else they must reproduce. Let people who want kids have them, let people who don’t want kids not have any, it’s working out and population growth has slowed and hopefully population will decrease. That’s fine, yes many of us will be old at once, that’s not the fault of the non-reproducing people. There wouldn’t be fewer old people even if everyone had kids, it has to happen before things settle back out.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Very much agree. Besides, it is looking like we really are entering an era of significant human life extension if you believe all the longevity breakthroughs.

        • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lucky we have automation and AI making everyone jobless, will be plenty of people and machines to look after the older generations

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That is a real crisis on the horizon as the evidence so far is that there is no support for those who get displaced. I am counting down the days till my career is replaced. I am Imagineering a VR Theme Park and am certain that in the years to come you will be able to ask AI to make you one via a prompt and it will customize it to your tastes. When that happens I need to find a new career. Unsure what but I am hopeful that new careers will open up that we cannot foresee today. That or we will all be in a hellscape of which I have positioned myself to weather.

            • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I think if we don’t change the system then we’re going to have a world of hurt for pretty much everyone, if we do change the system into something that facilitate an existence where people can survive periods without work or with minimal work then it could become a golden age.

              A lot of the big problems with that comes from legacy obsessions which persist even when technical solutions have displaced the need or reason behind them. Building sites are already nothing like they used to be, the cost of construction has fallen dramatically especially in labour time but house prices rise because they’re not tied to construction cost but availability, which is often kept purposely low so rich people who run government can have big numbers in their balance s sheets. At some point this stress point will fracture.

              Subtle automation already makes things like surveying and designing incredibly easy, we’re not far from the point where ai assisted architecture tools are as easy to use as the Sims and will produce plans which can be automatically passed or rejected for the technical side of planning. Not only will more visible forms of automation like concrete shuttering and pouring become more widely adopted this again reducing the time and cost of construction but they’ll have sensor driven analysis which can be uploaded to local authorities for instant inspection and verification. Likewise for cable routing, pipework, insulation, plastering, brickwork, roofing, decorating…

              When a house can be demolished and rebuilt in weeks for the cost of machine rental and materials then the housing crisis will fade away, especially when industrial areas shrink due to efficiency of automation, office space gets repurposed, and transport infrastructure gains efficiency - areas like where I live in the UK with absurd property prices are almost certainly going to see automated construction tools take a lot of industry and transport underground - shooting cargo down small underground networks could replace a huge amount of road and rail usage which would be a huge positive for people and free up space for housing.

              I got off track but what I’m getting at is we can use these things to solve major problems in our society, but we need to make sure people can lose their job and go through peeiods of adjustment without it ruining their life.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Maybe. There is serious breakthroughs with longevity tech with aging and diseases perhaps being a thing of the past in the decades to come. Maybe.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The crisis is that without enough babies, there will not be enough young people to support the older people.

          So you didn’t read a word I said beyond the first sentence. Got it.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I do not understand your comment as my comment was building upon yours as you went down the billion support path and I just added the old age pension path.

  • crackajack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s why even if Russia wins the war or got some concessions, it will be a Pyrrhic victory. They’re already experiencing population decline because of massive emigration aside from lower birth rate (which is why Putin is paying lip service to the conservative religious Russians to promote more birth, and in turn endeared him to conservatives across the world). The war will add to the burden of the Russian people on top of corruption and debt after the conflict.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      They need the dogma of out breeding the competition so they can maintain a labor class without giving up any of the hoarded resources.

      No sane people want to breed in our current conditions anywhere, so gotta make them insane with promises of eternal hurrdurr if only you crank out babies for God.

      • crackajack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        They need the dogma of out breeding the competition

        That’s why the far-right in the West would love women to go back to their old baby churning role…

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They’re working on it. Alongside the abortion fight, there are also Republicans fighting no fault divorce and there are Republicans fighting minimum marriage age laws.

    • Mistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      More than that. We have a giant demographical pit starting down from 25 y.o. and bottoming out at around 20-22 y.o.

      It’s WW2 stacked on top of the economic collapse in the 90ies and now this. It is ugly.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Looked up. It is order of coutry that no longer exists. It is impossible to get one.

      • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe not exactly, but… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Heroine

        Mother Heroine (Russian: Мать-героиня, Mat’-geroinya) is an honorary title that was used in the Soviet Union and now Russia, awarded for bearing and raising a large family.

        On 15 August 2022 Vladimir Putin signed a decree reviving the honorary title.[2]

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Also Putins intent is to turn Russia back into the Soviet Union

          You wish. Straight to fucking Russian Empire.

        • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do not really see a problem with this one. Don’t most countries recognize families with X number of children and give some benefits? It doesn’t immediately mean everyone starts having 10 children families.

          • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I know that in America they recognize it in the form of “thanks for the worker, here is financial assistance/diapers/food/etc if you need the help so your kids don’t clog up our hospital system with your uninsured, diaper-rash-turned-infection starving children, and have some child care tax credits either way.”

            In Sweden I think every newborn comes home with a huge box of diapers clothes formula if needed etc. And I think it’s a monthly box for X number of months.

            But large families aren’t looked at as a status symbol like they’re trying to make happen in Russia, and as it was in the Soviet Union. Literal military metals of 3 levels for the amount of children you had (Level 1 was highest honor, level 3 was lowest). Except maybe for some certain sects of certain religions, like some of Catholicism and Mormonism. But that’s for more messengers to spread the word of Jesus/Joseph Smith.

            • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Actual medal does seem weird, true. I think I have heard Finland having a similar care package, sounds pretty cool and probably the best option to first of all guarantee parents do not get a monetary allowance that could be spent elsewhere, booze for example.

              Looked into my country laws and in Latvia you get a monthly allowance based on total count of children up to realistically 18 or 20 years (depends if you continue education)

              • one child - EUR 25 per month
              • two - EUR 100 per month (EUR 50 for each child);
              • three - EUR 225 per month (EUR 75 for each child);
              • four and more children - EUR 100 per month for each child.

              If you have 3+ kids you also can get a card that has benefits / reduced cost for various services.