• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have spurred on the solar/wind movement successfully though, albeit whilst using coal as a crutch. Even so, without the greens, alternative energy might never have been a discussion in a country like Germany which is positively obsessed with gas and cars

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany co2 emission for energy is 3 times that of France thanks to ecologists!

    • snaf@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is replacing nuclear with renewables does nothing to combat climate change. We need to be reducing fossil fuels. At the very least, they should have phased out coal before nuclear. While france was busy reducing its dependence on coal, Germany remains the largest producer of coal in Europe.

      • scratchee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re certainly right that their handling of nuclear was inefficient for reducing carbon output.

        I’m pretty pro nuclear, but I don’t think that really takes away from their success in pushing renewables forward, they were a very early adopter of solar thanks to their very generous subsidies and probably helped fuel its growth at a faster rate, so regardless of their unfortunate paranoia around nuclear, they do deserve some praise. Perfect is the enemy of good, and given the speed the world has responded to climate change, Germanys mixed and painful transition was certainly not the worst.