• oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you’re making 150k and are living paycheck to paycheck you either live in a crazy expensive area or are a total fucking idiot when it comes to managing your money.

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rent in NYC where I live is insane. My partner and I recently toured a place where they broke up the basement of a building into 4 apartments, none of which had a real bedroom, and were asking for $3k each

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        Supply and demand.

        You can always move somewhere else and have hope of one day owning property. Or you can rent forever and have nothing to pass on to your kids.

        The choice is yours. I wouldn’t wait around for others to solve your problems.

        • Mandarbmax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ya, people should be forces to move away from their family and friends and home by insane cost of living and instead of sympathy we should just expect them to single handedly solve an entire fucked up economic system.

          🤡

              • interceder270@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                What are you talking about? I support spreading out so there are more developed areas that people want to live.

                Passing a bunch of money around in major cities is what exacerbates the disparity in wealth. Why should city people who already have more wealth get even more before those who have less?

                • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I really don’t think that’s how any of this works, dude

                  You need to invest in areas if you want them to be “developed” so people want to live in them. If you force poor people to leave places where there are more opportunities (e.g. economic, educational, occupational, etc.) for them, you’re basically dooming them and their following generations to poverty. This is why I said you support low social mobility and high income inequality.

                  Now just think of who the poorest people are in cities - it’s a lot of minorities, single parents, people in debt, etc. That should immediately tell you “city people” don’t have more wealth than most people elsewhere. As far as I can tell, the working class anywhere serve mainly to enrich the wealthy class.

                  I’ve always looked at it this way: should the people that scrub toilets in NY or SF or LA be paid enough to live in the same city? Everything I’ve seen tells me the average American answers this question with a resounding “No!” People in those areas have to make hour-long commutes to put food on the table for their family. I don’t see why we should accept essential workers being paid less than they deserve.

                  • interceder270@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    That’s exactly how it works. Why do you think it’s more expensive to live in major cities than outside of them? Supply and demand. There’s more demand and less supply. Why is there more demand? Because more people would prefer to live there.

                    Why should we invest in major cities that have already reached diminishing returns on their investments instead of spreading out to make more places attractive to more people? Entitlement. Life outside of major cities isn’t good enough for some, and they think people living in major cities should get more before everyone else who has less.

    • Punkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Try making $150k in a “reasonably priced area.” It can be done, but is not the norm. The problem is that to make a good salary, you have to be in a place that pays those wages. Obviously, this attracts more people, so real estate is more expensive.

      The trick is to make $150k in some kind of sweet spot where housing does not compensate. But it’s always a moving target and is extremely difficult. Then in you lose your job? Start all over again.

      • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I started working remotely and then left America. Now I live in a very low cost of living city and haven’t owed more than 1-2% taxes in years… It blows my mind that more people don’t do this.

        • interceder270@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Most people won’t do something if they think it’s “too hard,” even if it will solve their problems.

        • aphonefriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Where did you go? And how do you not pay fed taxes working for an American company? Or is it a foreign company?

          • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Georgia (the country) and Turkey mostly.

            Qualifying for the FEIE (stay out of America for 330 days per year) means you don’t pay taxes on the first $120k you earn. Maxing out the 401k ($22,500) will reduce taxable income as well so it’s really like the first $142,500 is tax free.

            I work for an American company as a W2 employee.

      • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        You just explained how work from home jobs will transform how people buy housing and where they buy it.

        • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeah, my job went remote in 2020 and this year I moved out of the city and just bought my first house in my home state where the cost of living is almost 1/2 of my former city. I could’ve would’ve never bought a place where I was before. I’m sure someone would have loaned me the money but that felt like a death sentence for my small amount of disposable income.

          I make $150k and learned to manage a very strict budget living in the city. Now I have some disposable income and my own house with a yard.

      • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Make your bank and go live in a mobile home until you can afford to live elsewhere.

        • Punkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because in your world, mobile home trailer parks are free or even exist in urban areas. Come on. A studio apartment around here starts at $1600/mo. The average home sale price in this area in 2022 was $580k. At 10% down, 30 year fixed, at 6.5% interest, after taxes and fees, that’s a mortgage payment of about $4000/mo. Plus about $300-600/mo if you have an HOA/COA. Plus repairs as needed.

          Your net take home pay at $150k, after taxes only, is about $9k, making your mortgage 45% of your income. That doesn’t include health insurance, retirement, or any other paycheck deductions.

          It doesn’t include transportation: payments, gas, repairs, tolls, or insurance.

          That doesn’t include utilities: gas, electric, water, trash, phone, or internet.

          That doesn’t include food, supplies, clothing, or personal care.

          And it sure as shit doesn’t include medical issues. God help you if you’re a diabetic.

          And kids? What are you, fucking Rockefeller? Daycare, schooling (yes, even public schools cost money because of all the extras they ask you to provide like supplies, lunch, etc), and all their needs. At at least 16 years before they might be able to pay rent, that’s a long time for a free tenant sharing your resources.

          Plus all of life’s extra costs.

          And looking at Zillow, I can’t find any properties within 10 miles of me going for less than $600k. They got townhomes for 1.2 million just down the block. $580k for a house is gonna be hard to find, and probably not in the best condition. Doable, possibly, but not easy.

      • JDubbleu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        My salary is $160k in the most expensive region in the country. My total yearly expenses don’t exceed $50k, $20k of which is rent. The rest maxes out my 401k and goes towards a house down payment fund. I have a $30k emergency fund in case I lose my job which gives me 9 months of runway.

        I’m not a nomad by any means. I have very nice things and I spend a grand a month on wants (eating out, my hobbies, whatever else I impulse order from Amazon), but I’m extremely aware of all my purchases and budget out every transaction at the end of every week. Hell, I just spent $2k on Christmas to get my family very nice gifts, but I’ve been spending less and sacrificing wants the past few months to offset that to prevent lifestyle creep.

        This is a financial literacy problem, not a $150k is not a lot of money problem.

        ETA: I split rent 50/50 with my partner in the California Bay area for a decent-sized 2b2.5b townhouse. My friends who do have 5 housemates, as so many of you seem to think I do, pay $1050 a month in rent, or $12.6k a year.

        • ALavaPulsar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          You live in the most expensive region of the country but you only pay $20k in rent? Is your idea of “most expensive” Akron or something?

            • JDubbleu@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I live in the California bay area (not going to get more specific than that), and split rent of a townhouse 50/50 with my partner. I live in a stupid bougie area too, so I’m not doing myself any favors there pricewise.

              You cannot get a SFH here for under $2 mil, and our townhouse we rent is worth well over $1 mil. I could easily afford the whole place by myself, but that would be financially irresponsible. I was very fortunate to be taught at a young age that being able to afford something does not make it a good or okay use of money.

              If I weren’t living with my partner, I’d get a one bed or studio apartment for ~$2200 a month, or an extra $6400 a year. Unless someone took on a mortgage way larger than they could actually afford (again, a financial literacy issue), or has an extremely expensive medical condition, I have 0 idea how anyone could be paycheck to paycheck on $150k a year and unable to massively cut back. The world is expensive, but it ain’t THAT expensive.

              • karakoram@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                To get a townhome in the bay at ~2k a month is a complete outlier with respect to rent. I live in a similar COL area and the cheapest you could rent that kind of space is for ~3.5k monthly in the present market.

                • JDubbleu@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I didn’t say I got a townhome for ~2k a month. The place I split with my partner is $3300 a month, and if I didn’t live with them I’d get a smaller, much cheaper apartment.

                  Edit: Alright everyone can go on believing you need a million dollars a year to scrape by in the bay area lmao. I’m done responding since everyone already has their minds made up about what it’s like here, and somehow saying I could get a studio or one bed for $2200 is the same as a whole ass townhouse.

                  I just hope more people can learn to be good with money, and we can stop this terrible capitalistic cycle of consumer over-spending and debt.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hi, this is pretty much me, and I concur. If you can’t live on $150k then you are definitely making some questionable decisions. That’s around $8k/m take home. Even if you are spending $4k on rent/mortgage, you should have plenty left over to live on.

            • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Yeah, if you’re a single man who doesn’t have anyone to take care of and has no physical or mental health problems $150k is great. If you’re part of a house with two incomes you’re probably OK. If you’re on a single incoming supporting parents with disabilities, kids, partners with disabilities, or any combination of similar things, you can maybe get by on $150k as long as you never fuck up and everything goes perfectly in your life and you don’t care about or try to help anyone else.

              Edit: and I say man, because men are less likely to take on caregiver roles that cost large amounts of money.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                My wife is disabled FYI. I get what you are saying, but there is still a good amount of wiggle room in our budget. I also still don’t really like the idea of lumping kids, which are a choice with a very clear financial impact, in the same category as dealing with illness and disability. That doesn’t seem to be a good faith argument.

                • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  23
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  A society where having kids is an unsustainable financial decision is a society that can’t continue to exist, and a society where caregiving for someone with a disability or having one yourself makes life impossible is also a society that can’t continue to exist.

                  There are also a ton of other factors that can easily push someone over the edge. “We have lots of wiggle room” is great for you but lots of people don’t… And even if someone did make a mistake, why should some small mistake put someone in inescapable debt?

                  I just think the idea that $150k is fine and everyone who can’t make it is an idiot isn’t taking in to account the obvious data that shows the opposite.

                  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    It does always strike me as ridiculous when we live in a world where continuing the existence of the human race is considered bad financial planning. No wonder birth rates are declining massively when the incentives are all on personal productivity and streamlining your life rather than having/raising a family. I don’t plan to have children for a number of reasons, but the fact that society is filled with active disincentives certainly doesn’t help persuade me otherwise.

                  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    In addition, the idea that if you don’t have enough money then you just don’t get to have a family seems abhorrent.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, if you’re a single man who doesn’t have anyone to take care of and has no physical or mental health problems $150k is great. If you’re part of a house with two incomes you’re probably OK

                Why would it matter how many people it takes to make the 150k?

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Then your family isn’t making 150k and you’re not part of this discussion.

                    Also if you’re making more than 150k and can’t pay your bills, I have 0 sympathy for you.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I make 150k, have 3 kids (one in college), a home, 2 cars, etc and I am most assuredly not living paycheck to paycheck

            • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Good for you. I’m glad you don’t care about other peoples problems because you’re fine.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I own a home just outside of a city and my mortgage is 1060/mo. 3BR, 3 bath, finished basement, on a half acre.

        • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Good for you. I bet you have to drive everywhere and you don’t even realize that the cost of the infrastructure to make your life convient is bankrupting your closest city.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            What a dumb shit comment lol.

            I literally volunteer on campaigns to change local zoning to be more dense and contain more public transport.

            “You countered my point so quick let me think up some way to attack you as a person” lol.

            • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Telling people to “go move outside the city like I do” does exactly the opposite of what you say you’re trying to support, so why even bring it up?

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Good thing there are plenty of places to live outside of major cities.

        The only people who this isn’t a solution for are those who feel they’re entitled to live in places they can’t afford 🤷

        • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          A lot of people like not commuting several hours a day, or having access to actual culture, or not being constantly robbed by meth heads, or not being murdered because of their Identity, or about a million other things that are difficult to impossible outside of cities…

          But fuck all the queer and trans people who escaped to the safety of cities. If they can’t afford t, they shouldn’t be there, right? /s

    • hpca01@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Hmmm you’re not going to be making 150k a year in a shit fly over state.

      I moved from the Bay Area to the East side of Washington near Seattle, folks here don’t make as much as I do for sure, at least not on average. We both have good salaries so we can afford a lot of things. We essentially got to keep most of our bay area salaries.

      But even then if we need a big repair we still have to sit down and plan out the money.

      I can’t even imagine what it’s like for folks around here.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Titles at my company are kinda dumb, but I’m the head of employee development for a manufacturing company

            Title is “Talent Development Specialist” which makes me sound like a trainer lol

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I have 13 years of experience but my first Directorship was after 5 (comparable budget and authority).

                This job is technically a step down for me but the money was right and it’s a unique opportunity

      • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I live in Nebraska, and all comp included make around 155k per year salary + bonus. You can make that kind of money even here in the “shit”

          • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m a software architect, though even when I was just a senior java developer I was making 130k, software pays well even in the fly overs.

            • hpca01@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m a level 2 Engineer and I make close to what you’re making TC. Hopefully maybe more come next year. And I don’t work for the big 5. I work for a hospital group. Seniors make well close to double that in TC. Principals make slightly more.

              Also there are more jobs for higher levels than in non tech hubs. Career wise you’ll probably be making more complex systems too.

              You have it good for sure, but you’re the outlier my guy.

              • TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I know that, I was just refuting the claim that “your not going to make that kind of money in a flyover state”, it is possible, and you don’t have to work the big 5 here either, and the cost of living is way less.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      In California, a new mortgage payment is 8-15k/month. Rent on an apartment is 3-4k/month. $150k salary isn’t enough for the mortgage and will struggle to cover that cost of rent.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In California, a new mortgage payment is 8-15k/month. Rent on an apartment is 3-4k/month

        Buddy of mine lives in LA and was just posting angry complaints about his rent going up to 1800/mo, so no.

        I’ve got three friends in the LA area and one in the Bay and none of them pay anything close to 3k/mo rent or 8k(!!!) on their mortgages.

        Those numbers are insane.

        • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          LA is cheap compared to the Bay Area. Also, I’m quoting numbers for new mortgages and new rentals. If you got your mortgage even 3 years ago, the numbers will be different.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Household income not personal income? And gross not net, correct? After healthcare, taxes and retirement deductions my net is 50% of gross so let’s say that calculates to 6,250 a month. It is a lot of money! But for a household of 4, 2 paid off cars 3 drivers and one college student with no tuition costs, and one high schooler in a school that gives everyone lunch(so it could be much worse) here the average community monthly costs are:

      2.5k mortgage with the tax & insurance in there, make that 3k if you are renting.

      800/ month car insurance

      600/month electric, water, internet

      200/month family cell phone service

      50/month streaming and donations to community radio

      600/month average repair & maintenance on home and cars

      Leaving 1700 for food for 4, gas, vet bills, credit card payments (because if someone is making bank now, they got there by making less for years). It’s certainly reasonable but here it’s about the least you can make household - wise and be solid, so if you are making 50k, you need three people working not two. And I can see how a family could get behind. That 2.5k plus $600 housing cost can be much more if you bought a house in the last year or so, and car loan or tuition could also blow this up, as could a medical emergency.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        800/ month car insurance

        The fuck? Why is your car insurance so expensive?

        600/month electric, water, internet

        The fuck? Why are you water and electric bills so high? I live alone, but my water bill is always <$40 and my electric bill is $70-$150 depending on if I’m running the A/C or heater.

        Internet for me is only $25/month because I use my phone for Internet and have unlimited data with Visible.

        200/month family cell phone service

        Switch to Visible, like I said. $25/month per line and you all have unlimited data so you can cut your cable Internet.

        50/month streaming and donations to community radio

        Complete waste of money. You don’t get to do these and then complain you don’t have enough.

        600/month average repair & maintenance on home and cars

        Lol, what? Are you constantly hitting your walls with hammers? Do you do offroading in a sedan? No way you’re spending $600 per month on home/car repairs (on average) unless you’re driving a Benz or BMW.

        That said, thank you for listing out your expenses. It’s a way more fruitful discussion when we talk actual numbers instead of vague “I don’t have enoughs.”

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Nope. 2 cars and 3 drivers here with one of them 18 years old. Highest cost car insurance market in the nation. But without that third driver our household income wouldn’t hit the $150k.

          Electric, Water, Internet. That’s mostly electricity. Electric bill is higher since I’m working from home, and everything in the house is electric (no gas bill) we don’t eat out much, cook a lot. Very high in the summer. Big windows, high ceilings, old house. Water includes garbage and is usually $100 or so. Internet about $75 FIOS so I can work from home mostly (2 cars not 3 that way).

          The $200 is a legacy t mobile plan covering 8 people so if needed I could get the grown kids to cover half of it, that one is high but not per line, we just pay it because if we cut them off it would still cost us $200 for 4 lines.

          House is older and cars are too. Tenting for termites has to happen every 10 years and costs 10k, we’ve had to fix plumbing, electric, replace an old porch, need blinds to help with the electrical cost, and the cars won’t last forever - I honestly think the $600 may be underestimating the cost of maintenance, not overestimating.

          And of course every month something happens. Vet bills, or some medical cost, or car repair eats the 600 AND the plumbing springs a leak, or I have to work weekends and we buy restaurant food - no month is just bills.

          It’s easy to go cheap for awhile, I have done that plenty. We have dry beans, rice, a garden. But things fall apart. I am putting here the cost of maintenance because if we don’t accrue this $600ish, it will end up costing even more. It’s a real cost.

          Oh, and I know this isn’t poor, lol. In my 20s lived with 3 families in one house and dumpster dived to make ends meet. Then raised 4 kids with a guy who, halfway through, decided he couldn’t work. 6 people living on what I could make, we are paying that deficit now too. Even so, this is is an awesome life, I am not complaining at all. Just saying that the bills do take most of the netpay if the real cost of housing and transportation is included.

          • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m driving a 26 year old car and don’t even spend $600 on maintenance in a year. $600/month ($7200/year) sounds crazy high. That’s like replacing an engine or transmission every year.

            • RBWells@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Correct, it’s mostly house. For a year, cars are about $400 in oil changes plus $300 in regular maintenance (brakes, etc.) and usually one repair or tires purchase of high cost, $600-1200. Its staying way below the cost of a new one.

              The house is the real money eater.

              • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ah, I didn’t realize you were lumping home and vehicle maintenance together. My water heater recently died after 19 years of solid use and that was more than a $2k project. I’m dreading the day the furnace goes out. Homes aren’t cheap.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I’m buying whatever I want and putting 10% in my 401(k) and that’s exactly the same as being poor

          These people lol

    • JollyG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or you only consider your expenses after savings and think that you are “living paycheck to paycheck” because you use up all your non-invested money by the end of the month.

    • deft@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s both. People try to always live above their means. Inflation causes that to catch up