• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    How the fuck do you counterfeit cheese? Do you use chocolate milk instead of regular?

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The designation “Parmigiano Reggiano” is a protected designation of origin (PDO) in the European Union.

      It means that to be able to call a cheese “Parmigiano Reggiano” a producer needs to follow a strict set of rules on how to produce the cheese, how to mature it, how the cows are being fed and it has to be manufactured in a specific area in Italy.

      So if someone is making cheese without following the rules and sell it as Parmigiano it would be counterfeit cheese. Just like someone selling lemonade but calling it “Sprite”.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And don’t forget the “origin” part. These designations also include being made in a specific region. You could follow all the rules and exact ingredients for Champagne, but if it’s not made in Champagne, France then you can’t call it Champagne. Same for Cognac, etc.

          • burningmatches@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Those European rules don’t apply in the US. You can also make parmigiano reggiano in the US.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Europeans definitely try to enforce rules like this worldwide, and AFAIK they’re mostly successful, at least in developed nations.

              I haven’t seen illegitimate Parmagiano Reggiano in the USA. They usually just refer to the US-made version as “parmesan”. I also live relatively close to Napa Valley and pretty much nobody here calls wine Champagne unless it’s actual Champagne, other than a few companies that still use that loophole I linked to.

              • burningmatches@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                True, you don’t see producers selling fake “parmigiano reggiano” in the US (why bother when most Americans only know it as parmesan anyway). But the EU couldn’t stop them. It’d more likely be a matter for US regulators if they consider it deceptive.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can also make parmigiano reggiano in the US.

              I thought parmigiano reggiano was also a protected term/origin in the US. Like Vidalia onions are. Most of the other EU ones aren’t though.

              That’s why “parmesan” is a thing - it’s a cheese similar to parmigiano reggiano, but with a shorter minimum aging time, and no requirements on where it’s made or what the cows are fed - parmesan can be made with commodity milk anywhere rather than in one part of Italy from a specific breed of cattle fed at least 50% by grass grown in that part of Italy. Other than the aging time the process is similar, which is why the cheese is similar.

            • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This isn’t entirely true, according the article. If a producer in the US was using the name “Champagne” before 2005, they can continue to do so, but producers can’t start using it anymore.

              It took two decades of negotiations, but finally, in 2005, the U.S. and the EU reached an agreement. In exchange for easing trade restrictions on wine, the American government agreed that California Champagne, Chablis, Sherry and a half-dozen other ‘semi-generic’ names would no longer appear on domestic wine labels – that is unless a producer was already using one of those names.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m as territorial and proud of what is made in my country as the next dude but the lengths taken to protect some products, especially by french and italian are ridiculous.

          • seejur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I kind of like it, because it becomes a small club where all members know each other and control each other. The product price is directly linked to the quality of the product, so all producers have a vested interest in controlling their neighboring producer.

            It also makes sense for agricultural products, where certain climate and earth composition influence the outcome a lot

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same for Lambic. For cheese and alcohol the region is important. All of these products have micro cultures or yeast in them. For Lambic, it’s a naturally occurring yeast. If they allow other beers to be produced in that region, then the commercial yeasts will dominate the natural Lambic yeasts in the finished product, and you will end up with a different end result. So the regional specification is a quality control method to ensure you get the exact same microbiology as has been used for hundreds of years.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just like someone selling lemonade but calling it “Sprite”.

        In Australia, we actually do use “lemonade” to refer to drinks like Sprite, lol. We don’t really have the American-style non-carbonated lemonade.

        • Gyoza Power@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You got it backwards. He meant that it’s the same as selling lemonade while trying to pass it as Sprite because of the branding.

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because the use of the name parmigiano reggiano requires that the cheese come from a certain region of Italy (or somewhere in Europe). There’s nothing else special about it. Counterfeit cheese in this case is just the same exact cheese but made elsewhere and likely sold for cheaper.

      Source: I work in cheese and also Wikipedia several months back

      • meliaesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m picturing you as an average office worker, but with a Willy Wonka-esque boss who has replaced all of the furniture with various types of dairy products.

      • Akisamb@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not exactly true. If you make parmigiano you have to follow pretty strict manufacturing procedures to ensure that the cheeses have the same taste.

        It’s pretty much the same thing as a brand except it’s not produced by one structure but several independent structures. The main advantage is that you know what you are getting.

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case you may be right, but region protected products can be quite ridiculous. For example Bourbon:

          • Produced in the U.S. and its Territories (Puerto Rico), as well as the District of Columbia
          • Made from a grain mixture that is at least 51% corn
          • Aged in new, charred oak containers
          • Distilled to no more than 160 (U.S.) proof (80% alcohol by volume)
          • Entered into the container for aging at no more than 125 proof (62.5% alcohol by volume)
          • Bottled (like other whiskeys) at 80 proof or more (40% alcohol by volume)

          (Source Wikipedia)

          That’s pretty fucking generic except for the made in USA portion. If I’m not mistaken Champagne has similarly silly restrictions with no significant difference.