A report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) raised the question of whether Russia might be emboldened to fire a NSNW in the belief that the West lacks the resolve to deliver a nuclear response.

  • flappy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    It said the logic of using a NSNW would be to escalate a conflict in a controlled fashion, “either to prevent the US and NATO from engaging, or to coerce them into war termination on Russian terms”.

    WTF are they smoking?

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If the calculation was solely of Russia and Ukraine, that might be considered a logically sound gamble, if still under long-odds. But it’s not. It’s a question of the normalization of the use of nuclear weapons, and sure as shit that won’t fly.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nothing. This is to scare the West.

        I Russia using a nuclear weapon (even just a small tac nuke) would have the opposite effect on the West. I also think the backlash from non-western nations against Russia would be significant too. No one wants it to be “acceptable” to use nuclear weapons except in defense, and only as a last resort.

        Russia started this war with a invasion. If the rest of the world gives Russia a pass, then any other nuclear nation would expect the same in their offensive operations. Since there are only 9 nuclear armed nations, the other 171-ish nations would not like to give that kind of permission.

        • MrMakabar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But Russia is not using nuclear weapons, they write strategy papers about using nuclear weapons.