downpunxx@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoyou wanna know how i got this paycheckmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1387arrow-down19
arrow-up1378arrow-down1imageyou wanna know how i got this paycheckmedia.kbin.socialdownpunxx@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareFinancedPizza@lemming.questlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·edit-21 year ago*an 8 year old youtuber’s parents that made $26 million this year
minus-squarebob_wiley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down1·1 year agoCorrect. The kid is simply being exploited for profit by the parents. These kids will likely end up spending any money their parents might save for them on therapy.
minus-squarestallmer@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year ago“These toys aren’t for playing with you fuck, they’re for opening on video and making other kids feel bad.” his parents, probably
minus-squareDaisyifyoudo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago100%. Still does not change the meaning of this shitpost 1 bit
minus-squarefoofiepie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoLet me guess, is this that Ryan kid who opens all the toys. Essentially 100% product placement? That kid has a high chance of going postal one day.
minus-squarecollegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoRyan hardly appears in his videos anymore, he has a whole fucking production company that churns out new bullshit
minus-squaretool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI don’t know if the Coogan Law would apply here, but if it does, they’d get at least 15%.
minus-squarebob_wiley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoI doubt it. I don’t think there is any barrier to entry or oversight for starting up a YouTube channel.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoif theyre decent people theyll save at least half for him, but who knows.
*an 8 year old youtuber’s parents that made $26 million this year
Correct. The kid is simply being exploited for profit by the parents. These kids will likely end up spending any money their parents might save for them on therapy.
“These toys aren’t for playing with you fuck, they’re for opening on video and making other kids feel bad.”
100%. Still does not change the meaning of this shitpost 1 bit
Let me guess, is this that Ryan kid who opens all the toys. Essentially 100% product placement? That kid has a high chance of going postal one day.
Ryan hardly appears in his videos anymore, he has a whole fucking production company that churns out new bullshit
I don’t know if the Coogan Law would apply here, but if it does, they’d get at least 15%.
I doubt it. I don’t think there is any barrier to entry or oversight for starting up a YouTube channel.
if theyre decent people theyll save at least half for him, but who knows.