• CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cost of living, yes, and if you’re a solid performer, 3% is considered good. However, this is a 5% across the board, and a large increase to entry level.

    • Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cost of living in Japan has seriously spot up lately, and the government has been pressuring companies to raise salaries. So I’m glad to see Capcom doing this.

      • CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        For what country?

        In the US, at least, the long term average is 3.10%, including the post-1913 Great Depression and the Oil Crisis/Great Inflation of the 1970s. From 1990-2020, the average has been 2.2%, just slightly worse than the stated goal of current US economic policy, which is to maintain long term inflation at a rate of 2%.

        Meaning, 3% beats inflation significantly more than half of the time, especially since 1990.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          We had two consecutive years of 6-8% general inflation in Spain, and lots of raw food products almost doubled in size, and while that went down a while ago, they still stayed at a 30% increase. Salaries didn’t increase though, most companies in my sector gave a fat round 0 increase as a baseline, then a 4-5% increase for people that excelled in performance.

          Yeah we do earn way more than the minimum wage but we are basically earning less than last year, every year.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well if we use the US - we have to acknowledge that the actual rate of inflation is not on that chart. For starters it does not even take into account Shrinkflation - a trend that is not new. Secondly - the calculation changes to make inflation appear significantly lower for multiple reasons.

          https://www.fedsmith.com/2023/04/19/inflation-severity-depends-how-its-measured/

          https://www.cnbc.com/id/42551209

          Then there are problems that CPI doesn’t cover housing costs anymore. And it allows nonsensical substitution. Such as implying that if you are used to buying $10 Roast Chicken - and are now forced to buy $2 Canned Chicken - you have experienced deflation. But in reality you cannot afford the roast chicken because of high inflation and your standard of living has gone down.

          https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-macroeconomics/chapter/examining-the-consumer-price-index/

          We have too many measures tied to Poverty Rate and Inflation that it’s a quagmire to change it to reflect reality.