• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Russia can’t even conquer a quarter of Ukraine. No chance they’re going to invade Sweden, a country they don’t even share a border with. Is Canada afraid of being invaded by Russia? Is France? Is the UK?

    • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Russia can’t conquer even a quarter of Ukraine, and they still invaded Ukraine. Sweden and Finland know that Russia can’t conquer them, and that knowledge has made them stay neutral in the past. But Russia has just shown with Ukraine that they might try anyway just because, and it’s a huge pain in the ass for Ukraine and for everybody else in Europe too. So it’s only natural that Sweden and Finland would like to avoid even being tried to be conquered by Russia.

      And like we can see, the Russian invasion of Ukraine also impacts France, the UK, and Canada. It’s not that these countries have decided to brainlessly follow the US. They want to support other countries who are at more risk of being invaded by Russia because countries being invaded by Russia is a huge pain in the ass for everybody in the region, not just the country being invaded. So their foreign policy goals simply happen to line up with the US goals.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Who says anything about appeasement? That’s your words, not mine. Besides, Russia is already being appeased by NATO not letting Ukraine join.

        Why don’t NATO stop being cowards and admit Ukraine immediately? If they’re serious about “defending Europe and democracy”.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are other things to learn in history too, such as some countries, like Russia, simply lucking resources to fight wars this big. As the other commenter said, they can’t get past Ukraine.

        Hitler comparison is really out of place here. It’s more similar to some of the wars in Africa and Latin America.

        • someguy3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Notice you don’t actually address appeasement doesn’t work?

          But as for military defence alliance (notice how you tried to misportray that?): Points to cold war.

          Something tells me you’re a Putin apologist.

          You should listen to Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History. WW1 was interesting.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree, the USSR assumed too much good faith on the part of NATO. Millions of casualties from economic devastation later, nationalist wars are still breaking out between former soviet states, and Nazism is on the rise.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            It literally doesn’t matter who is invading who, it wouldn’t have happened without the western backed coup of soviet democracy.

    • Bimfred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Russia’s inability to conquer any of its neighbors is irrelevant. The possibility of them even attempting is unacceptable if you share a border with Russia. Sure, maybe Putin can’t hope to depose your government, but the destruction and deaths before his failure are still a horrifying reality that’ll take years, possibly decades, to recover from.

      As for why Sweden felt the need to join, despite not having a single meter of border with Russia, it’s because Finland felt the need to join. The two countries are tightly bound and do not want to end up on the opposite sides of a war. Now they’re much less likely to.