WATCH NEXT:Why Russian History Repeats itself (Putin and his hero Alexander III)https://youtu.be/bWJjrXVkFBAWhy Losing Crimea May Destroy Putinhttps:/youtu.b...
How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn’t the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?
How can you claim that a negative is obvious if, to express it, you need to acknowledge its positive axiomatically to have something to subject to negation? Doesn’t the very act of positing such a claim make it less obvious than if it were simply left unsaid?
What
Don’t play innocent, it’s you who’s claiming to obviously not be a banana. I’m asking: Isn’t that denial suspiciously specific?
I’m not claiming anything, obviously not.
Exactly what one would expect a banana to say in this situation.
🚫🍌
I think you’re confused… the video author is Vlad, he didn’t mean Putin…
That goes without saying, pretty much all undercover bananas, and not only those, are fans of Vlad.